The life and correspondence of Sir Anthony Panizzi, K.C.B., Vol. 1 (of 2): Late principal librarian of the British museum, senator of Italy, etc.Fagan, Louis
History
The life and correspondence of Sir Anthony Panizzi, K.C.B., Vol. 1 (of 2): Late principal librarian of the British museum, senator of Italy, etc.
Fagan, Louis
Panizzi, Anthony, Sir, 1797-1879
I rejoice at the prospect of your being here early this year, when we
shall, I trust, spend many hours together, the more so if I become a
member of Brooke’s,[J] where the “Bear”[K] took me to dinner one day,
against all rules and principles, and then said I ought to become a
member, and put down my name, and the good lord of this house[L]
gladly seconded it, and I suppose no one will object to me as far as I
can guess.
As to the important part of your letter, respecting public affairs and
the late hubbub, I, first of all, agree with you that, although things
_have not gone quite right_, they are not so bad as some thought (they
don’t think so now, and will think better of them every day, after the
first week of the session).
It seems to me evident, whatever may be said by those whose ambition
or greediness warps the judgment, that the Whigs ought not to have
taken office if they could help it. It is better that the world should
see that it is they, out of office and on principle, who help a
government to carry _their_ (I mean the opposition’s) measures, than
that they, the Whigs, should be at the mercy of their opponents for
going on at all.
Peel would have brought them about 25 members, and with those, and
great exertions and excitement, the Corn Laws might have been
repealed; but then would they not have been in their enemies’ hands on
all other questions, and on the most trifling measure unpalatable to
the Tories? Would not Peel then have left them? And do you think that
he would not have made his peace with the Tories, and be brought back
by them and by those who would attribute, though Tories, the carrying
of the good measure repealing the Corn Laws, to his support _out of
office_, of his opponents? For you must not forget there are many
friends of Peel who are against the Corn Laws; whereas there is not
one Corn Law friend who is a friend of the Whigs, and who would, soon
at all events, forgive them for repealing that Corn Law. The Whigs who
join the Tories on this question would, unquestionably, have joined
them in opposing Lord John’s Government, now and for some time to
come; then, had you Whigs failed even in carrying the repeal of the
Corn Laws, and being obliged to resign _reinfecta_, you would have
been the object of universal hatred and contempt from both friends and
enemies. From the former for having done too little, from the latter
for having done too much, and shown you are not either powerful
friends or terrible enemies.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account