The life and correspondence of Sir Anthony Panizzi, K.C.B., Vol. 1 (of 2): Late principal librarian of the British museum, senator of Italy, etc.Fagan, Louis
History
The life and correspondence of Sir Anthony Panizzi, K.C.B., Vol. 1 (of 2): Late principal librarian of the British museum, senator of Italy, etc.
Fagan, Louis
Panizzi, Anthony, Sir, 1797-1879
That Sir C. Barry’s statement—viz., that the space of only one year is
sufficient for the completion of the work is without foundation.
That the plan of removal of the greater objects of antiquity from their
present site to Sir C. Barry’s new hall would be attended with
extraordinary labour and expense, and that their position would be no
more conspicuous than before.
That mummies, metals, pottery, and objects having delicacy of colour
would run risk of injury.
That ventilation would be most difficult, and the approach to the area
highly objectionable.
Lastly, that the sudden fall of any large portion of the enormous glass
roof might destroy some most valuable object or objects of art.
Thus the Trustees dismissed the project of Sir C. Barry, and evinced an
inclination to cling to their own design, notwithstanding its rejection
by the Government.
It was not long, however, before they saw the expediency of adopting
Panizzi’s views; and in a letter to Lord Rutherfurd, the latter speaks
hopefully, first of his plan, and afterwards of his final anticipation
of the success of his scheme.
“B. M., May 16, 1854.
“... Lord Aberdeen and also Mr. Gladstone, but not Lord Lansdowne,
have been to look at the model, and both have agreed that the building
should be raised as proposed. The Trustees on Saturday were
unanimously of opinion that my suggestion was right, and have written
for the Treasury’s approbation, which, after what I mention just
before, will, no doubt, be given, and the thing done.”
The foundations of the New Reading-Room were commenced in May, and the
first brick was laid in September, 1854.
In a work of such a peculiar nature and vast importance, it would be
impossible to avoid the constant recurrence of obstacles and
difficulties; and a third letter from Panizzi to Lord Rutherfurd proves
conclusively that these were caused by circumstances quite unconnected
with the actual building operations. This we subjoin:—
“B. M., October 13th, 1854.
“... The building is going on tolerably. It will be used as a source
of great annoyance to me, particularly by our friend X——, who is here
for my sins. That building will cause yet to us all—I mean the
architect, builder, and myself—great anxiety and trouble; numberless
points are to be settled, and they are knotty ones. Then I have to
agree about it with some Trustees, who evidently have no clear
conception of what it is to be, and make suggestions and objections
which they would not make if they understood what that building is,
and how it will be when finished.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account