The life and correspondence of Sir Anthony Panizzi, K.C.B., Vol. 1 (of 2): Late principal librarian of the British museum, senator of Italy, etc.Fagan, Louis
History
The life and correspondence of Sir Anthony Panizzi, K.C.B., Vol. 1 (of 2): Late principal librarian of the British museum, senator of Italy, etc.
Fagan, Louis
Panizzi, Anthony, Sir, 1797-1879
There is no doubt whatever that the surface of the Dome, arranged and
coloured as it fortunately has been, presents a far better effect than
it would have done had it been surrendered to any such decoration as a
grand subject painting extending over the whole of it.
But _à propos_ of decoration, Panizzi’s letter, written just one year
before, and addressed to a Trustee of the British Museum, Mr. W. R.
Hamilton, will also testify to his judgment and taste in architecture:—
“B. M., June 11, 1855.
“My dear Sir,
I had no idea that my objections to showing the ribs in the
interior of the cupola, and to the form of the windows in it, would
ever have become the subject of discussion. I stated these objections
to Mr. Smirke and Mr. Fielder, and as the former was responsible, he
was perfectly right in persisting in his views if he thought me wrong;
and had that been done privately, I should have allowed the matter to
pass in silence. But as my objections have been formally canvassed and
summarily dismissed—as I am likely to get more blame for the new
building than I am fairly entitled to, and as I believe my objections
to have more in them than others allow. I think it right to put on
record these objections, being firmly convinced that the time will
come when the not having given them more consideration will be a
source of regret. If I write to you, instead of making a report to the
Trustees, it is because I do not want to say officially more than I
did on Saturday last to the Board, because Mr. Smirke appealed to you
originally as a friend, and because your unwearied kindness to me,
makes me confident that you will, on the same ground, forgive my
relieving my mind to you by repeating my objections.
1st.—As to the cupola: I object to its showing the ribs on which it
rests. I say that this is unprecedented, that it will have a bad
effect, that it renders it impossible ever to ornament it, and that
the oval frames which are introduced about half way, in the spaces
between the ribs are meaningless, not in keeping with the building.
Far from showing how they are constructed, it is their being as if it
were suspended in the air that gives the cupolas their grace, and
renders them striking objects. From them comes the light as from the
sky, of which they represent the form as much as it is possible for
mortals to imitate nature.
To show the ribs in a cupola is the same as if we were to show in
their nakedness the beams and girders supporting a floor or a roof.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account