The life and correspondence of Sir Anthony Panizzi, K.C.B., Vol. 2 (of 2): Late principal librarian of the British museum, senator of Italy, etc.Fagan, Louis
History
The life and correspondence of Sir Anthony Panizzi, K.C.B., Vol. 2 (of 2): Late principal librarian of the British museum, senator of Italy, etc.
Fagan, Louis
Panizzi, Anthony, Sir, 1797-1879
“... All the diplomacy in the world will not bring back either
those d—d Dukes or the Pope, and the provinces whence they have
been expelled. If Napoleon sticks to the point of not allowing any
_armed_ intervention in their favour, the legitimate Sovereigns
are dished. But, it is said, he has some interested motive if he
act so. I suppose he has; so much the better if his interests
coincide with the interests and wishes of Italy. It is a pity no
one else has the same interest; but, if no one will do the trick,
even he is welcome. I see that after all he is the only one who
does something for that country. If the Pope and Austrian
influence are done for, what is to come after it is of less
importance. If the European powers will aid and abet Austria in
keeping Venice, and in preventing a united kingdom of North Italy
being formed under Victor Emmanuel, I am sorry for it, but they
cannot complain if Plonplon is preferred by the Italians to the
Austrian and priestly tyranny. Better Austria than the Pope, but
better Plonplon than either. That is the scale.”
“B. M., April 21st, 1860.
“... How could you suppose that I ever could have said that
Elizabeth and Cromwell interfered to support _Catholicism_? My
answer was, and is, this:
“Europe is now in about the same state with respect to politics as
it was in Elizabeth’s and Cromwell’s times as to religion. These
two personages did not follow the policy which is now so much
praised of taking no side with either party, but showing the
greatest indifference to right or wrong. England, I think, has not
reached the lofty station it now occupies, by adopting this
policy; nor will she keep that position by such means.
“In the same manner that Elizabeth and Cromwell took the side of
liberalism in religion (Protestantism) England ought now to take
the side of liberty in politics, and she would thus rise still
higher.
“In 1848 England allowed liberty to be crushed everywhere; she
even allowed Russia to lend an army to Austria to crush an old and
constitutional kingdom. See how the Protestants are now treated
all over the Austrian Empire; how the Jesuitical party is rampant
in Germany and in Ireland; how Europe is crouching to Napoleon. Is
this to the advantage of free Protestant England?
“Now, suppose, instead of proclaiming her determination to keep
aloof (which neither Elizabeth nor Cromwell would have approved)
the Government of Queen Victoria has told Russia and Austria that
if Despots were to join to crush liberty, free governments would
support those who tried to recover their freedom, do you think
England would now be worse off?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account