The Life and Letters of George John Romanes, M.A., LL.D., F.R.S.Romanes, George John
Science
The Life and Letters of George John Romanes, M.A., LL.D., F.R.S.
Romanes, George John
Naturalists -- Great Britain -- Biography; Romanes, George John, 1848-1894
By reading pages 401 and 404 of my paper, you will see why such
cases are of quite as much importance to me as the converse, viz.
where closely allied species inhabiting _continuous_ areas are
more or less mutually sterile (see p. 392).
If you have hitherto failed to apply these converse tests to
my theory, I cannot conceive by what other principle you have
sought to test it. Pray read the passages referred to, which
present the shortest summary of what I regard as the very
backbone of my evidence.
If your large knowledge of geographical distribution should
enable you to supply me with specific cases of the general
principle mentioned by Darwin in the quotation given on page 392
('Origin of Species,' 6th ed., pp. 134-5), I should much like to
try experiments on the sterility which I should expect to find
between these interlocking species.
It seems comical to ask a scientific opponent for assistance, but
the fact of being able to do so proves the superiority of science
to politics.
December 25, 1888.
It is very good of you to write such a long and suggestive letter.
As a result of attentively reading your letter, it appears to me
that you think I suppose sterility in a high degree to be much
more usual among allied species than I do suppose it. I well know
the large amount of natural as well as artificial hybridisation
that goes on. But, on the other hand, there are so many species
which either will not cross at all, or produce sterile hybrids,
that, taking a general view of all species together, mutual
sterility does become by far the most generally distributed
single peculiarity--_i.e._ is the one peculiarity which, more
than any other that can be named, is common to numberless species.
Thus much for mutual sterility that is absolute, either in first
crosses or in their hybrid progeny. But now, the most important
thing for me is mutual sterility that is _not_ absolute (though,
on my theory, perhaps on its way to becoming so) but relative,
_i.e._ there being a _lower degree of fertility_ between A × B or
B × A, than there is between A × A or B × B.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account