The Life and Letters of George John Romanes, M.A., LL.D., F.R.S.Romanes, George John
Science
The Life and Letters of George John Romanes, M.A., LL.D., F.R.S.
Romanes, George John
Naturalists -- Great Britain -- Biography; Romanes, George John, 1848-1894
I am most glad that in your last letter you deal with what
I consider the real 'question'--viz. not whether degrees of
sterility obtain among a large proportional number of species,
but whether there is any such correlation between them and
absence of isolation of other kinds as my theory would expect.
And, in dealing with this question you hit upon precisely the
two greatest difficulties which I have myself concluded lie
against the theory. The first is about areas now discontinuous
having been once continuous, and our being so often unable to say
whether or not such has been the case. But this difficulty is
one that lies against _verification_ of the theory, not against
the theory itself. It was in view of this difficulty that I
mentioned oceanic islands as furnishing the best flora for trying
experiments upon; but since I published the paper, I have not
been able to hear of any botanists visiting islands. Should you
ever hear of any you might let me know.
The second difficulty is one that lies against the theory itself,
and has always seemed to me most formidable. But as nobody
else has ever mentioned it, I have not hitherto done so, as I
want to work it out quietly. I allude to your remark about the
extraordinary differences that obtain among different genera
with regard to the capability of intercrossing exhibited by
their constituent species. This, I confess, has from the first
appeared a tremendous objection to my theory. On the other hand,
I have taken comfort from the consideration that besides being
a tremendous objection, it is also a tremendous mystery. For, as
it must admit of some explanation, and as this explanation must
almost certainly have to do with the sexual system, it becomes
not improbable that when found the explanation may square with
p.s. That the difference in question is functional and not
structural (or physiological as distinguished from morphological)
seems to be proved by the fact that in some cases it obtains
as between the most closely allied genera, being, _e.g._, most
strongly pronounced of all between Geranium and Pelargonium. Even
quite apart from my own theory, it seems to me that this is a
subject of the highest importance to investigate.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account