The Life and Letters of George John Romanes, M.A., LL.D., F.R.S.Romanes, George John
Science
The Life and Letters of George John Romanes, M.A., LL.D., F.R.S.
Romanes, George John
Naturalists -- Great Britain -- Biography; Romanes, George John, 1848-1894
Fourthly, I do not know whether you will discuss in your book
on the 'Mind of Animals' any of the more complex and wonderful
instincts. It is unsatisfactory work, as there can be no
fossilised instincts, and the sole guide is their state in other
members of the same order and mere probability. But if you do
discuss any (and it will perhaps be expected of you) I should
think that you could not select a better case than that of the
sand-wasps, which paralyse their prey, as formerly described
by Fabre in his wonderful paper in 'Annales des Sciences,' and
since amplified in his admirable 'Souvenirs.' Whilst reading this
latter book, I speculated a little on the subject. Astonishing
nonsense is often spoken of the sand-wasp's knowledge of
anatomy. Now will anyone say that the Gauchos on the plains of
La Plata have such knowledge, yet I have often seen them prick
a struggling and lassoed cow on the ground with unerring skill,
which no mere anatomist could imitate. The pointed knife was
infallibly driven in between the vertebræ by a single slight
thrust. I presume that the art was first discovered by chance,
and that each young Gaucho sees exactly how the others do it, and
then with a very little practice learning the art. Now I suppose
that the sand-wasps originally merely killed their prey by
stinging them in many places (see p. 129 of Fabre, 'Souvenirs,'
and page 241), on the lower and softer side of the body, and that
to sting a certain segment was found by far the most successful
method, and was inherited, like the tendency of a bull-dog to pin
the nose of a bull, or of a ferret to bite the cerebellum. It
would not be a very great step in advance to prick the ganglion
of its prey only slightly, and thus to give its larvæ fresh meat
instead of old dry meat. Though Fabre insists so strongly on the
unvarying character of instinct, yet it shows that there is some
variability, as on pp. 176, 177.
I fear that I shall have utterly wearied you with my scribbling
and bad handwriting.
My dear Romanes,
Yours very sincerely,
CH. DARWIN.
_From G. J. Romanes to C. Darwin, Esq._
18 Cornwall Terrace, Regent's Park, N.W.: April 17, 1881.
Your long letter has been most refreshing to me in every way.
I am looking forward with keen interest to the appearance of your
book on Worms, and am unexpectedly glad to hear that my letter
was of any use.
I should very much like to see the book you mention, and from
what you say about sending it I shall not order it. But there is
no need to send it soon, as I have already an accumulation of
books to review for 'Nature.'
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account