The Life and Letters of George John Romanes, M.A., LL.D., F.R.S.Romanes, George John
Science
The Life and Letters of George John Romanes, M.A., LL.D., F.R.S.
Romanes, George John
Naturalists -- Great Britain -- Biography; Romanes, George John, 1848-1894
These years between 1879 and 1890 were years of frequent despondency,
of almost despair, but also of incessant seeking after truth, and
year after year he grew gradually nearer Christian belief.
The letters which follow will be interesting in this place. They
arose out of a correspondence in 'Nature.'[47]
_To Professor Asa Gray._
May 16, 1883.
Dear Professor Gray,--The receipt of your kind letter of
the 1st instant has given me in full measure the sincerest
kind of pleasure; for in the light supplied by your second
letter communicated to 'Nature' I came deeply to regret my
misunderstanding of the spirit in which you wrote the first one,
and now you enable me to feel that we have shaken hands over the
matter.
For my own part I am always glad when differences in matter of
opinion admit of being honestly expressed without enmity, and
still more so when, as in the present case, this discussion leads
to a basis of friendship. I therefore thank you most heartily for
your letter, and remain yours very truly,
G. J. ROMANES.
P.S.--If you have not already happened to read a book called 'A
Candid Examination of Theism,' I should like to send you a copy.
I wrote it six or seven years ago and published it anonymously
in 1878. I do not now hold to all the arguments, nor should I
express myself so strongly on the argumentative force of the
remainder, but I should like you to read the book, in order to
show you how gladly I would enter your camp if I could only see
that it is on the side of Truth.
December 30, 1883.
Dear Professor Gray,--I sent you my papers as a return for those
which you so kindly sent to me, and for which I have written to
thank you before. I quite agree with your view, that the doctrine
of the human mind having been proximately evolved from lower
minds is not incompatible with the doctrine of its having been
due to a higher and supreme mind. Indeed, I do not think the
theory of evolution, even if fully proved, would seriously affect
the previous standing of this more important question.
The sorrow is, that this question is so far removed from the
reach of any trustworthy answer. Or, at least, such is the sorrow
if that answer when it comes is to prove an affirmative. If it
is to be an eternal sleep, no doubt it is better to live as we
are than in the certainty of a Godless universe. But although
we cannot find any sure answer to this momentous question, I
cannot help feeling that it is reasonable (although it may not
be orthodox) to cherish this much faith, that if there is a God,
whom, when we see, we can truly worship as well as dread, He
cannot _ex hypothesi_ be a God who will thwart the strong desire
which He has implanted in us to worship Him, merely because we
cannot find evidence enough to believe this or that doctrine of
dogmatic Theology.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account