Thou hast read the sermon extremely well, _Trim_, quoth my father. --If
he had spared his comments, replied Dr. _Slop_, ----he would have read
it much better. I should have read it ten times better, Sir, answered
_Trim_, but that my heart was so full. --That was the very reason,
_Trim_, replied my father, which has made thee read the sermon as well
as thou hast done; and if the clergy of our church, continued my father,
addressing himself to Dr. _Slop_, would take part in what they deliver
as deeply as this poor fellow has done, --as their compositions are
fine; --[I deny it, quoth Dr. _Slop_]-- I maintain it, --that the
eloquence of our pulpits, with such subjects to enflame it, would be a
model for the whole world: ----But alas! continued my father, and I own
it, Sir, with sorrow, that, like _French_ politicians in this respect,
what they gain in the cabinet they lose in the field. ----’Twere a pity,
quoth my uncle, that this should be lost. I like the sermon well,
replied my father, ----’tis dramatick, --and there is something in that
way of writing, when skilfully managed, which catches the attention.
----We preach much in that way with us, said Dr. _Slop_. --I know that
very well, said my father, ----but in a tone and manner which disgusted
Dr. _Slop_, full as much as his assent, simply, could have pleased him.
----But in this, added Dr. _Slop_, a little piqued, --our sermons have
greatly the advantage, that we never introduce any character into them
below a patriarch or a patriarch’s wife, or a martyr or a saint. --There
are some very bad characters in this, however, said my father, and I do
not think the sermon a jot the worse for ’em. ----But pray, quoth my
uncle _Toby_, --who’s can this be? --How could it get into my
_Stevinus?_ A man must be as great a conjurer as _Stevinus_, said my
father, to resolve the second question: --The first, I think, is not so
difficult; --for unless my judgment greatly deceives me, ----I know the
author, for ’tis wrote, certainly, by the parson of the parish.
The similitude of the stile and manner of it, with those my father
constantly had heard preached in his parish-church, was the ground of
his conjecture, --proving it as strongly, as an argument _à priori_
could prove such a thing to a philosophic mind, That it was _Yorick’s_
and no one’s else: --It was proved to be so, _à posteriori_, the day
after, when _Yorick_ sent a servant to my uncle _Toby’s_ house to
enquire after it.
It seems that _Yorick_, who was inquisitive after all kinds of
knowledge, had borrowed _Stevinus_ of my uncle _Toby_, and had
carelessly popped his sermon, as soon as he had made it, into the middle
of _Stevinus_; and by an act of forgetfulness, to which he was ever
subject, he had sent _Stevinus_ home, and his sermon to keep him
company.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account