The life and times of George Villiers, duke of Buckingham, Volume 1 (of 3): From original and authentic sourcesThomson, A. T., Mrs.
History
The life and times of George Villiers, duke of Buckingham, Volume 1 (of 3): From original and authentic sources
Thomson, A. T., Mrs.
Buckingham, George Villiers, Duke of, 1592-1628
In February, 1617, Nathaniel Brent wrote to Sir Dudley Carleton: “By the
Marquis of Buckingham and his mother the Spanish match is much
apprehended, though methinks there needs no such haste, the lady being
yet scant eleven years old. In the meantime every man hopes or fears as
he is affected, and they say the Lord Treasurer is so far possessed,
that, like another Cato, that began to learn Greek at threescore years
old, he hath got him a Spanish reader, and applies it hard.” The
influence of the Countess of Buckingham doubtless, therefore, turned the
scale against Ralegh, to the vexation of her son’s best friends. “She
was,” writes Bishop Hacket, who knew her well, “mother to the great
favourite, but, in religion, became a step-mother. She doated upon him
extremely, as the glory of her womb, yet, by turning her coat so
wantonly when the eyes of all the kingdom were upon her, she could not
have wrought him a worse turn if she had studied a mischief against
him.” “Many,” adds the same writer, “marvelled what rumbled in her
conscience all that time; for, from a maid to a maiden, she had not
every one’s good words for practice of piety.”[240] “Arthur Wilson
complains also that the Countess of Buckingham was the cynosure that all
the Papists steered by; but that it was above her ability to bear the
weight of that metaphor.”
Footnote 240:
Hacket’s Life of Archbishop Williams, vol. i., p. 171.
“The Countess was,” he adds, “a protectress of the Jesuits and
Jesuitesses, the females of that order, of whom there were no fewer in
England than two hundred English ladies of good families.” Her opinions
were well known to affect her son, who now began to be accused by the
Puritans of Armenianism, and became the friend and patron of Archbishop
Laud. Gondomar saw well to what point to direct his insidious game. The
Countess had a share in the management of State affairs; she, with her
son, guided the helm, and as much court was paid to her as to
Buckingham, whilst both received far more adulation than was thought
necessary to bestow on the King himself. Wittily, though somewhat
impiously, Gondomar wrote to the Spanish Court that “there never was
more hope of the conversion of England than now; for there are more
prayers and oblations offered here to the mother than to the son.”[241]
Footnote 241:
Oldmixon, p. 52.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account