The life and times of George Villiers, duke of Buckingham, Volume 2 (of 3): From original and authentic sourcesThomson, A. T., Mrs.
History
The life and times of George Villiers, duke of Buckingham, Volume 2 (of 3): From original and authentic sources
Thomson, A. T., Mrs.
Buckingham, George Villiers, Duke of, 1592-1628
In a subsequent letter to Charles himself, Kensington again exalted the
services of the queen-mother in promoting this match, and extolled the
charms of the Princess. “There is no preparation, I find, towards this
business, but by her--the queen-mother; and all persuasions of amity
made light that look not towards this errand; and, sir, if your
intentions proceed this way, as, by many reasons of state and wisdom,
there is cause now rather to press it than slacken it, you will find a
lady of as much loveliness and sweetness to deserve your affection as
any creature under heaven can do.” The “impressions he had of her,” he
adds, “were but ordinary, but the amazement extraordinary, to find her,
as I protest to God I did, the sweetest creature in France. Her growth
is very little short of her age, and her wisdom infinitely beyond it. I
heard her discourse with her mother and the ladies about her with
extraordinary discretion and quickness. She dances, which I am a witness
of, as well as ever I saw any creature. They say she sings most sweetly;
I am sure she looks so.” In conclusion, Kensington mentions to His
Highness that, in his letter to “my Lord of Buckingham,” he had written
a more large discourse upon this interesting theme.[192]
Footnote 192:
Cabala, p. 1287. This letter is dated Feb. 26, 1624.
Thus far had the treaty proceeded, when it was delayed by the death of
King James. The marriage articles had, nevertheless, been subscribed by
that Monarch on the 11th of May, and by the King of France on the 13th
of August, in the previous year; and, on the 13th of March, 1625, the
Earls of Carlisle and Kensington signed these articles on the part of
Charles I. Private arrangements received also their signature relative
to the toleration of Catholics within the British dominions.
The dispensation for the nuptials having arrived from Rome in the
beginning of May, there remained no obstacle to the ceremonial of
marriage. This, notwithstanding the claim preferred by the Archbishop of
Paris to that honour, was performed by Cardinal Richelieu. The marriage
was celebrated according to the usual rites of the Church of Rome. After
the ceremony, the whole procession, including the royal personages,
entered the church of Notre Dame, the Duke de Chevreuse and the Princess
Henrietta Maria taking precedence of the King and Queen. Then mass was
said, the English ambassadors retiring to the Bishop’s house during the
recital.[193]
Footnote 193:
Rushworth’s Collection, p. 169.
A banquet followed, and the event was commemorated by the release of
criminals, "as an earnest of the King’s love and respect for his
sister."[194] The previous arrangements for these ceremonials had been
delayed by much contention with regard to precedency.[195] But that
which gave the greatest uneasiness to the English nation was the
difficulty, and, as it seemed to many, the risk attendant upon the mode
of faith professed by the young Queen.
Footnote 194:
Ibid.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account