The life and times of George Villiers, duke of Buckingham, Volume 3 (of 3): From original and authentic sourcesThomson, A. T., Mrs.
History
The life and times of George Villiers, duke of Buckingham, Volume 3 (of 3): From original and authentic sources
Thomson, A. T., Mrs.
Buckingham, George Villiers, Duke of, 1592-1628
“Ordered, that all such pictures as shall have the representation of
the second person in the Trinity upon them shall be forthwith
burnt.”
"Ordered, that all such pictures there, as have the representation
of the Virgin Mary upon them, shall be forthwith burnt."[161]
Footnote 161:
Walpole’s Anecdotes of Painting, vol. iii., p. 297--from the
Journals of the House of Commons.
This, Walpole remarks, was a worthy contrast to Archbishop Laud, who
made a Star Chamber business of a man’s breaking some painted glass
in the cathedral at Salisbury. Times were changed; Laud, however,
looked on the offence as an indication of a spirit of destruction
and irreverence;--unhappily, he was right.
Such was the fate of Buckingham’s pictures: a brief notice of the
proceedings which dispersed the far more valuable collection of the
King must not be omitted. Immediately after Charles’s death, votes
were passed for the sale of his pictures, statues, jewels, and
“hangings.” It was then ordered that inventories should be made, and
commissioners be appointed to appraise, secure, and inventory the
said goods. Cromwell, to his honour, attempted to stop the
dispersion of these valuables; but he had matters of even greater
importance to engage his attention, and the sale, about the year
1650, appears, as far as the paintings were concerned, to have been
completed. From that time no further mention of them is to be found
in the Journals of the House of Commons.[162]
Footnote 162:
Walpole’s Anecdotes of Painting, vol. iii., p. 200.
All the furniture from the ill-fated King’s different palaces was
brought up, and exposed for sale; and, as far as relates to the
jewels, plate, and furniture, the affair was not concluded until
1653. It must, indeed, have been a melancholy sight. Cromwell,
through his agent, was one of the principal purchasers. The price of
each article was fixed, but, if any one offered a higher sum,
preference was given. Cromwell, who resided alternately at Whitehall
and Hampton Court, bought the Cartoons for 300_l._ The order against
“superstitious” pieces was not, it seems, strictly observed; for a
painting of Vandyck’s, “Mary, our Lord, and Angels,” sold for
40_l._[163] The celebrated portrait of George, the second Duke of
Buckingham, and his mother, by Vandyck, one of the finest
productions of that master, was valued at 30_l._, and sold for
50_l._ Many of the finest pictures were bought by Mons. Jabach, a
native of Cologne, settled in Paris, who sold his collection
afterwards to Louis XIV. “The Entombment,” by Titian, which he
secured, and “Christ and the Disciples at Emmaus,” are in the
Louvre. Amongst the pictures in the Mantua collection, was the large
“Holy Trinity;” it was bought by De Cardenas, the Spanish
Ambassador; and on its arrival Philip IV. exclaimed, "That is my
pearl"--and the picture has, ever since, been known by that name.
Footnote 163:
Ibid., p. 204.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account