The Life and Times of Queen Victoria; vol. 1 of 4Wilson, Robert
History
The Life and Times of Queen Victoria; vol. 1 of 4
Wilson, Robert
Great Britain -- History -- Victoria, 1837-1901; Victoria, Queen of Great Britain, 1819-1901
Lord John Russell had failed, as has been said, to form his
Administration when the Cabinet of his rival broke up. Here it may now
be convenient to explain the reason of that failure, which he laid
before his disappointed Sovereign. On the morning of the 20th of
December, when Sir Robert Peel waited on the Queen at Windsor, and was
asked to withdraw his resignation, her Majesty had been disturbed by a
letter from Lord John Russell, stating that he must abandon all hopes of
forming a Ministry, because he had been unable “in one instance” to
secure indispensable support from his more prominent followers. Who were
the “prominent followers”? and who, “in one instance,” thwarted the
Leader of the Opposition in his effort to extricate the Queen, from the
difficulty in which she was entangled? The pragmatic “instance” was Lord
Grey, and his refusal to serve the country in the hour of need was a
matter not of principle but of personal feeling. Writing to Mr. J. F.
Macfarlan, Chairman of the Edinburgh Chamber of Commerce, on the 22nd of
December, 1845, Mr. (afterwards Lord) Macaulay told the whole story.
“You will have heard,” he says, “of the termination of our attempt to
form a Ministry. All our plans were frustrated by Lord Grey.... On my
own share in these transactions I reflect with unmixed satisfaction.
From the first I told Lord John that I stipulated for one thing only,
total and immediate Repeal. I would be as to all other matters
absolutely in his hands; that I would take any office, or no office,
just as it suited him best; and that he should never be disturbed by any
personal pretensions or jealousies on my part. If everybody else had
acted thus there would now have been a Liberal Ministry.” We now know
that Macaulay was mistaken. It was perfectly well known, not only to the
Queen, but to the chiefs of the great parties, that Lord John Russell
could never have carried Repeal, for two reasons. He was distrusted by
Free Traders like Cobden. It was impossible to expect that the House of
Lords, who threatened to revolt against Wellington, would accept Free
Trade from the Whigs, many of whom were eager to maintain a small fixed
duty on corn. All this was quite well understood at Court, and it
partially accounts for the unconcealed delight with which the Queen
asked Sir Robert Peel to withdraw his resignation. It was, moreover,
suspected at the time that the Court--always distrustful of Lord
Palmerston--privily sympathised with the feelings of Lord Grey, who
thought that the only office which Lord Palmerston was willing to
accept, was precisely the one in which he would do irretrievable
mischief. He had been Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, and
naturally he could not, with self-respect, serve another Whig Government
in an inferior capacity. But Lord Grey, though quite ready to serve with
Palmerston if he took some other Department, held that, if he went to
the Foreign Office, his pugnacity, combined with the hostile animus
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account