The Life and Times of Queen Victoria; vol. 2 of 4Wilson, Robert
History
The Life and Times of Queen Victoria; vol. 2 of 4
Wilson, Robert
Great Britain -- History -- Victoria, 1837-1901; Victoria, Queen of Great Britain, 1819-1901
catastrophe. And, in spite of the splendid fighting qualities of our
men, the catastrophe must have happened, had it not been for two
blunders which the Russians committed. In the first place, Menschikoff,
who seems to have been even a stupider person than Raglan or Burgoyne,
attacked in massive columns. This so reduced his fighting front that our
weak detachments formed in line decimated them with their fire, and when
our artillery came into action every shot and every shell also told on
them with deadly effect. The Russian sortie from Sebastopol, moreover,
was mismanaged. The commander lost his way in the mist, and instead of
falling on us, he found himself entangled with the French far away on
our left, so that he gave no real aid to the main attack.
The Russians lost 12,000 men in this battle, the French lost 1,800, and
the British lost 2,600. It was therefore clear that the siege must be
raised, or that the Allies must enter on a winter campaign. Up till now
the troops had suffered very little hardship; but, alas! when winter set
in they were doomed to cruel suffering. A terrific storm on the 14th of
November blew
[Illustration: VALLEY OF INKERMANN.]
down their tents and destroyed twenty-one vessels in Balaclava Bay laden
with supplies. It rendered the valley from Balaclava to the camp--a
distance of nine miles--almost impassable. Two-thirds of the transport
horses died, and there was hardly any forage obtainable for the
remainder. Cholera--the germs of which had been carried to the Crimea
from Varna--raged in our lines, and those who escaped it fell victims to
scurvy, dysentery, or fever. “Between the beginning of November,” writes
Mr. Spencer Walpole, “and the end of February, 8,898 British troops
perished in hospital. At the last of these dates 13,608 men were still
in hospital.”[191] The state of the hospitals was so bad that men died
there more quickly than on the field. Part of the ghastly tale of
mismanagement had been told by Mr. W. H. Russell, the special
correspondent of the _Times_, when Parliament met on the 12th of
December, and empowered the Queen to raise a foreign legion and utilise
the Militia for foreign service--measures forced on the Ministry by
Prince Albert. But soon after it separated the cry of distress from the
Crimea grew too loud to be stifled. When it rang through England the
people turned on the Government in furious anger, and called them to
account for their gross mismanagement of the war. The Duke of Newcastle,
being Secretary of State for War, was blamed because he was alleged to
be incompetent. Aberdeen was blamed because it was said he was at heart
a Russian. The scurrilous charges against Prince Albert were revived,
and he was accused of impeding the operations of our army by his
treacherous interference. As a matter of fact, these charges were all
untrue. Prince Albert, Aberdeen, and Newcastle were the three men who
alone had courage to face the situation, when they suddenly discovered
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account