The Life and Times of Queen Victoria; vol. 3 of 4Wilson, Robert
History
The Life and Times of Queen Victoria; vol. 3 of 4
Wilson, Robert
Great Britain -- History -- Victoria, 1837-1901; Victoria, Queen of Great Britain, 1819-1901
“Lord Clarendon,” writes Count Vitzthum, in his bright
but brief account of the secret history of the Conference, “who, though
nominally second, was in reality the first British plenipotentiary,
induced Lord Russell, with a view of checking the bloodshed, to propose
the separation of Holstein, Lauenburg, and South Sleswig. The
neutrals--Russia and France--agreed to this, but the Danish
representatives declared that their instructions were exhausted, and
thus the matter remained to be settled by the sword.”[201]
Count Vitzthum’s narrative does not seem quite fair to Denmark. The
Danes, it must be noted, have always alleged that they agreed to a
frontier proposed by Lord Clarendon, and accordingly they assumed that
after such a surrender of their position England would defend them and
stand by her own proposition. Lord Russell, however, in his statement of
the 27th June, denied that England had, through Lord Clarendon,
committed herself to maintain this frontier. The fact is that Austria
and Prussia, at a meeting of the Conference on the 17th of May, brought
the proceedings to a deadlock by declaring that they would no longer
recognise the King of Denmark as Sovereign of the Duchies. The neutral
Plenipotentiaries then met privately at Lord Russell’s house and
concocted a compromise by which Denmark should cede Holstein and Sleswig
as far as the Schlei, and that the European Powers should then guarantee
the rest of the Danish Dominions. Denmark accepted this proposal, but
the German Powers, whilst eagerly accepting the principle of separating
the Duchies from Denmark, objected to the frontier. According to a
statement made by Bishop Monrad in the Danish Rigsraad, it is clear the
compromise was not distinctively an English project, though it
originated in Clarendon’s suggestions. But, according to Bishop Monrad,
“Earl Russell promised that neither would he make a proposal himself nor
support the proposal of any other Plenipotentiary which would be less
favourable for Denmark, unless Denmark herself should consent to such
new proposals.” Yet after the boundary of the Schlei had been suggested,
Earl Russell, at a meeting of the Conference, proposed that the question
of the frontier should be submitted to arbitration--the King of the
Belgians being mentioned as arbiter--although Denmark did _not_ consent
to such a proposal. This proposition, partially accepted by Austria and
Prussia, was rejected by Count Beust on behalf of the Diet. France then
proposed that, while Germany should take German and Denmark should keep
Danish Sleswig, the intervening part, with a mixed population, should by
a _plébiscite_ determine its own destiny. This was also rejected by
Denmark, and so the Conference, which met at the request of England
without a basis, separated without a result.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account