The Life and Times of Queen Victoria; vol. 4 of 4Wilson, Robert
History
The Life and Times of Queen Victoria; vol. 4 of 4
Wilson, Robert
Great Britain -- History -- Victoria, 1837-1901; Victoria, Queen of Great Britain, 1819-1901
June disquieting rumours flew about to the effect that there had been
a revolution in Bulgaria, and that the Turks had suppressed it by
massacres of the most revolting barbarity. The Government met these
tales with jaunty persiflage. On the 10th of July Mr. Forster put a
question on the subject, which Mr. Disraeli answered by saying that he
considered the reports exaggerated, nor did he think that torture had
been resorted to by “an Oriental people who, I believe, seldom resort
to torture, but generally terminate their connection with culprits in
a more expeditious manner.”[92] This ill-timed jest was hailed with a
great guffaw of laughter from the Ministerial Benches. It destroyed Mr.
Disraeli’s authority in the country when the awful truth was revealed,
not by the diplomatic agents of England, who strove hard to conceal
it, but by two American gentlemen, Mr. J. A. Macgahan, a distinguished
journalist, and Mr. Eugene Schuyler, the United States Consul-General
in Turkey. They went to Philippopolis on the 25th of July, and Mr.
Macgahan’s description of what he saw in the country, which had been
ravaged by the Turks, when published in the _Daily News_, sent a thrill
of horror through the
[Illustration: SIR JAMES FALSHAW.
(_From a Photograph by J. Moffat, Edinburgh._)]
civilised world. The partisans of Turkey were enraged beyond
self-control, and vowed that the worst of all outrages that had been
committed was that which was perpetrated by the publication of Mr.
Macgahan’s report on the brutalities of the Turkish soldiery. The
wild work of the Sepoys at Cawnpore was indeed merciful and humane
compared with what had been done by the Turks at Batak. Indiscriminate
butchery could alone be laid to the charge of the Indian mutineers.
But in Bulgaria, before the Turk murdered his victims, he inflicted on
them fiendish tortures and bestial outrages. The Province was one vast
desolation covered with blackened ruins, devastated fields, putrefying
corpses, and bleached skeletons. Neither age nor sex had been spared.
The land would have been as silent as a desert, save for the wailing
of the scattered remnant of the Christian population who had eluded
the vengeance of their oppressors. As for the Porte--whose promises
of reform in Bulgaria were cheerily cited by Mr. Disraeli to cast
doubt on the descriptions of these atrocities--it gave but one sign
of action. It promoted Achmed Aga, the barbarian who was responsible
for all this wickedness, to be Governor of the Province which he had
laid waste.”[93] The effect of these revelations on public opinion was
heightened by Mr. Gladstone’s pamphlet, entitled “Bulgarian Horrors,”
and by his speech at Blackheath on the 9th of September, wherein he
convicted the Government of apologising for Turkish barbarities, when
it could no longer venture to deny their existence. He laid down the
lines of the new Eastern policy which England must support. The Turkish
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account