The Life and Times of Queen Victoria; vol. 4 of 4Wilson, Robert
History
The Life and Times of Queen Victoria; vol. 4 of 4
Wilson, Robert
Great Britain -- History -- Victoria, 1837-1901; Victoria, Queen of Great Britain, 1819-1901
not only had Lord Beaconsfield and Lord Derby permitted their project
of the Conference to be laughed to pieces by the Turks, but all they
had to say to Parliament was that they were sorry that Turkey had
misunderstood her own interests. They were quite contented to accept
the defeat of their scheme meekly. Their position appears rather abject
to those who look at it critically, and yet no other was practically
open to them. Only a small faction, led by Lord Hartington and Mr.
Gladstone, were for coercing Turkey. A still smaller faction of idle
loungers, whose favourite phrase was that “Piccadilly wanted a little
wholesome blood-letting,” were for joining Turkey in a war against
the Slav States headed by Russia. The people were divided between
their spasmodic fear of Russia and their equally spasmodic loathing
for the Turks, and Radical Russophobes, like Mr. Joseph Cowen, were
just as loud in demanding non-intervention as Radical Russophiles
like Mr. Bright. Thus the policy of the Government--that of demanding
concessions from Turkey from a love of Humanity, and tamely submitting
to a contemptuous refusal, from fear of Russia, fairly well reflected
the mind of the English democracy.
Sir Stafford Northcote’s leadership of the House of Commons was not
promising. He tolerated the obstruction of a small group of members,
who caused the Bill which closed public-houses in Ireland on Sundays
to be abandoned, after Ministers stood pledged to its principle, and
all parties in the House were willing to pass it. He permitted his
more devoted followers to oppose a Resolution moved by Mr. Clare
Read--who had left the Government because he considered that they
neglected agricultural interests--in favour of County Government
Reform. But at the last moment he put forward Mr. Sclater-Booth
to accept the Resolution in a speech which was evidently meant as
a conclusive argument against it. Mr. Cross’s Prisons Bills, too,
spread disaffection among the squirearchy. These measures reduced the
management of gaols in the three kingdoms to something like uniformity.
But they made the prisons national and not local institutions,
centralised their administration in the hands of the Imperial
Government, deposed the local justices from their position of control
over them, and charged their cost to the Consolidated Fund.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account