The Life and Times of Queen Victoria; vol. 4 of 4Wilson, Robert
History
The Life and Times of Queen Victoria; vol. 4 of 4
Wilson, Robert
Great Britain -- History -- Victoria, 1837-1901; Victoria, Queen of Great Britain, 1819-1901
Hafiz Pasha, the Minister of Police, to apologise.[154] The commutation
of Ahmed’s sentence meant that, though England had saved him from the
gallows, “Kismet” had destined him for a premature grave. The apology
from Hafiz was immediately converted into a further insult to the
British Government, for, as soon as it had been delivered, the Sultan
decorated him with the Grand Cordon of the Medjidie. Nor was this act
quite atoned for by the issue of an Imperial edict forbidding the
Mohammedan Press to laugh at the British Ambassador. It was, therefore,
easy to predict that the Queen’s Speech would be demure, if not
actually meek in tone, when it touched on Foreign Affairs.
[Illustration: WINDSOR CASTLE: A PEEP FROM THE DEAN’S GARDEN.]
Parliament was opened on the 5th of February, and her Majesty’s Speech
was read by the Lord Chancellor. Events, according to the Royal
Message, still tended to safeguard the peace of Europe on the basis
of the Berlin Treaty, and the Sultan had signed a Convention for the
suppression of the Slave Trade. The abdication of the Ameer rendered
it impossible to recall the army of occupation. But the Government, in
their dealings with Afghanistan, merely desired to strengthen their
Indian frontier and preserve the independence of that State. The
success of Sir Garnet Wolseley’s policy in South Africa was touched
on. It was stated that the Irish authorities had been instructed to
make special provisions for coping with distress in Ireland, which
would necessitate an Indemnity Bill; and a Criminal Code Bill, a
Bankruptcy Bill, a Lunacy Bill, and a Conveyancing Bill were promised.
Mr. Cross had, at the end of the previous Session, also promised a
Bill to transfer the Metropolitan Water Companies to the ratepayers
of London. The debates on the Address were uninteresting. The Tories
tried to discredit their opponents by proving that in election contests
they angled for the Irish vote by promising to support an inquiry
into the demand for Home Rule. The Liberals retorted by proving that
though Lord Beaconsfield was ever ready to pass sentence of political
excommunication on Home Rulers, he was equally ready to confer honours
on Home Rulers,[155] that the Home Rule movement was started by
Tories, and that it was a rich Tory who found the money for the Fenian
candidature of O’Donovan Rossa in Tipperary.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account