The Life and Times of Queen Victoria; vol. 4 of 4Wilson, Robert
History
The Life and Times of Queen Victoria; vol. 4 of 4
Wilson, Robert
Great Britain -- History -- Victoria, 1837-1901; Victoria, Queen of Great Britain, 1819-1901
Then, when the vote for the Irish Police was moved, Lord
Randolph Churchill and the Fourth Party vanished into the background,
and left the work of obstruction to the Parnellites, who kept it up
till one o’clock in the afternoon of the following day (Friday, the
27th of August). The debate was at this stage adjourned till next
Monday, when, after further discussion, the vote was carried. During
these exciting and troublous scenes Mr. Gladstone was absent from the
House of Commons. He had fallen ill on the 4th of July, and had gone
for a cruise in one of Sir Donald Currie’s steamers, the _Grantully
Castle_, to recover his health. During his absence his duties were
taken up by Lord Hartington, who led the House till Mr. Gladstone was
able to reappear on the 3rd of September. On the 6th of September
Parliament was prorogued. But during the recess the condition of
Ireland grew worse and worse. The landlords, dreading the forthcoming
Land Bill, pressed on evictions. The Land League urged the people to
refuse to pay rack rents, and the League had by this time become so
powerful, that it could enforce its decrees almost as surely as if it
had been the regular Government of the country. Its favourite weapon
of coercion was to pronounce against bailiff or landlord, land agent
or “land grabber”--_i.e._, a man who offered to take a farm from which
the tenant had been unjustly evicted--sentence of social ostracism.
The victim of this sentence was not assaulted or outraged, but he
was treated as if he were a leper by his neighbours, and the system
came to be known as “boycotting.”[165] Boycotting was indignantly
assailed in England, and yet it was in itself a mark of progress. Just
as slavery in primitive warfare was an improvement on cannibalism as
a means of disposing of prisoners, so boycotting, carefully carried
out within the law, was an improvement on assassination as a means of
agrarian coercion. But the demand for retaliatory measures against the
Parnellites was loud and strong among the upper and middle classes.
Mr. Forster at last yielded to it, and it was in vain that Mr. Bright
protested in one of his speeches that “force was no remedy.” Outrages
increased in Ireland. The ladies of the Tory aristocracy, and some of
the great Whig families, made arrangements for devoting their _salons_
during the coming Session, to a social campaign against Mr. Chamberlain
and the Radical section of the Cabinet. On the 2nd of November, 1880,
the Irish Attorney-General filed an indictment of nineteen counts,
against Mr. Parnell, Mr. Dillon, and various leaders of the Land
League, for conspiring to incite tenants not to pay rent or take farms
from which the occupiers had been evicted, but the trial, after lasting
for twenty days, broke down, because the jury could not agree on a
verdict. Ere the year ended it was known that the Cabinet, though it
had nearly been broken up by the decision, had at last consented to let
Mr.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account