The Life and Times of Queen Victoria; vol. 4 of 4Wilson, Robert
History
The Life and Times of Queen Victoria; vol. 4 of 4
Wilson, Robert
Great Britain -- History -- Victoria, 1837-1901; Victoria, Queen of Great Britain, 1819-1901
The violence with which the Irish Members obstructed this Bill provoked
Mr. Bright to attack them in a speech on the 27th of January, which
rendered him and them enemies for life. Mr. Gladstone followed in the
same vein, and on Monday, the 31st of January, a scene that became
historic was enacted. The debate was prolonged all day and all night,
and on through the dull, grey hours of the morning of the 1st of
February, and still on all night without ceasing, till the enraged
and exhausted House found itself at nine in the morning of the 2nd
of February still in session and with no prospect of release. Then
the Speaker interfered, saying that it was clear to him the Bill had
been wilfully obstructed for forty-one hours. In order to vindicate
the honour of the House, whose rules seemed powerless to meet the
difficulty, he declared his determination to put the main question
without further debate. This was done amidst loud shouts of “Privilege”
from the Irish Members, who left the House in a body, and the motion
for leave to bring in the Bill, a motion rarely obstructed by any
debate, was carried by a vote of 164 to 19. For the first time in
the history of Parliament, a debate had been closed by the personal
authority of the Speaker.
Mr. Gladstone having announced that the Second Reading of the Bill
would be taken that day at noon, the Irish Members returned to the
charge. They attempted to challenge the action of the Speaker, and
moved the adjournment of the House; but in spite of the support which
they received from Lord Randolph Churchill, they were beaten on a
division, though they succeeded in wasting the whole of the sitting.
Next day (Thursday, the 3rd of February) the Irish Members began the
attack by asking if it were true that Mr. Davitt had been arrested.
“Yes, sir,” was the answer of Sir William Harcourt. Then, when Mr.
Gladstone rose to move the adoption of the new Rule of Procedure,
Mr. Dillon rose to a point of order. The Speaker requested him to be
seated, but he refused. He was then “named” for wilfully disregarding
the authority of the Chair, and, in conformity with the Standing Order,
Mr. Gladstone immediately moved his suspension for the rest of the
sitting. The motion was carried by a vote of 395 to 33, and, as Mr.
Dillon declined to withdraw, he was removed by the Serjeant-at-Arms.
After a futile attempt on the part of Mr. Sullivan to dispute the
legality of the Speaker’s action, Mr. Gladstone again rose, whereupon
The O’Donoghue moved the adjournment of the House. The Speaker ruled
that Mr. Gladstone should proceed. Mr. Parnell now moved that Mr.
Gladstone be not
[Illustration: MR. PARNELL.
(_From a Photograph by William Lawrence, Dublin._)]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account