The life and times of the Rev. John Wesley, M.A., founder of the Methodists. Vol. 1 (of 3)Tyerman, L. (Luke)
History
The life and times of the Rev. John Wesley, M.A., founder of the Methodists. Vol. 1 (of 3)
Tyerman, L. (Luke)
Methodism; Wesley, John, 1703-1791
“These disorders resembled, in some of their features, the
demoniacal possessions mentioned in the gospel history. The
bodily agitations were perhaps as extreme in the one class
of instances as in the other; nevertheless, there is no real
analogy between the two. The demoniacs were _found_ in this
state by Christ where He went preaching; they did not _become
such_ while listening to Him. Besides, in no one instance
recorded in the Gospels or Acts, did demoniacal possession, or
any bodily agitations resembling it, come on as the initial
stage of conversion. How then are we to dispose of such cases?
Perhaps not at all to our satisfaction, except so far as this,
that they serve to render so much the more unambiguous the
distinction between themselves and those genuine affections
which the apostolic writers describe and exemplify.”
What says Wesley himself? With due deference to the great names
quoted, we respect his testimony more than theirs: first, because he
was, in sobriety of feeling, in depth of learning, and in clearness
of judgment, at least their equal; and secondly, because his opinion
was pronounced after being an eye-witness, whilst theirs is founded
entirely upon the representations of others, and their own ideas of how
things ought to be.
1. The cases were real, not pretended, and often ended in genuine
conversion. “You deny,” writes Wesley at the time, “You deny that
God does now work these effects; at least, that He works them in
this manner. I affirm both; because I have heard these things with
my own ears, and have seen them with my own eyes. I have seen very
many persons changed, in a moment, from the spirit of fear, horror,
despair, to the spirit of love, joy, and peace; and from sinful desire,
till then reigning over them, to the pure desire of doing the will of
God. I know several persons, in whom this great change was wrought in
a dream, or during a strong representation to the eye of their mind,
of Christ either on the cross, or in glory. This is the fact; let any
judge of it as they please.”[305]
2. Why were these things permitted? Wesley says: “Perhaps it might be
because of the hardness of our hearts, unready to receive anything
unless we see it with our eyes and hear it with our ears, that God, in
tender condescension to our weakness, suffered so many outward signs of
the very time when He wrought this inward change to be continually seen
and heard among us. But although they saw ‘signs and wonders’ (for so I
must term them), yet many would not believe. They could not indeed deny
the facts; but they could explain them away.”[306]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account