The life and times of the Rev. John Wesley, M.A., founder of the Methodists. Vol. 1 (of 3)Tyerman, L. (Luke)
History
The life and times of the Rev. John Wesley, M.A., founder of the Methodists. Vol. 1 (of 3)
Tyerman, L. (Luke)
Methodism; Wesley, John, 1703-1791
The lull in the opposition to the Oxford Methodists was of short
continuance. A month after the date of Mr. Clayton’s letter, Wesley had
to mourn the death of his friend Morgan, and to defend himself against
the accusation that Morgan had hastened his death by the rigorous
fasting, which he had practised at Wesley’s recommendation.[105]
Wesley’s long letter fully satisfied Morgan’s father, who expressed
himself as almost wishing to be one of the Oxford Methodists himself,
and as ready to vindicate them from any calumny or aspersion that might
be cast upon them.[106] There were others, however, of a different
mind, for a fortnight after Mr. Morgan wrote thus to Wesley, an article
appeared in _Fogg’s Weekly Journal_, to the effect that there were,
in the Oxford University, a number of persons who, in order “to live
up to the principles of Christianity had doomed themselves to absurd
and perpetual melancholy;” and that “these sons of sorrow designed
to make the whole place a monastery.” The writer continues: “These
Methodists pretend to great refinements, as well as to what regards
the speculative, as the practical part of religion; and have a very
near affinity to the Essenes among the Jews, and the Pietists in
Switzerland. The chief hinge, on which their whole scheme of religion
turns, is, that no action whatever is indifferent; and hence they
condemn several actions as bad, which are not only allowed to be
innocent, but laudable, by the rest of mankind. They avoid, as much
as possible, every object that may affect them with any pleasant or
grateful sensations. All social entertainments and diversions are
disapproved of; and, in endeavouring to avoid luxury, they not only
exclude what is convenient, but what is absolutely necessary for the
support of life; fancying, (as is thought,) that religion was designed
to contradict nature. They neglect and voluntarily afflict their
bodies, and practise several rigorous and superstitious customs, which
God never required of them. All Wednesdays and Fridays are strictly
to be kept as fasts; and blood let once a fortnight, to keep down the
carnal man. At dinner, they sigh for the time they are obliged to spend
in eating. Every morning to rise at four o’clock, is supposed a duty;
and to employ two hours a day in singing of psalms and hymns, is judged
an indispensable requisite to being a Christian. In short, they
practise everything contrary to the judgment of other persons, and
allow none to have any (religion) but those of their own sect, which is
the farthest from it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account