The life and times of the Rev. John Wesley, M.A., founder of the Methodists. Vol. 2 (of 3)Tyerman, L. (Luke)
History
The life and times of the Rev. John Wesley, M.A., founder of the Methodists. Vol. 2 (of 3)
Tyerman, L. (Luke)
Methodism; Wesley, John, 1703-1791
Moravianism was increasingly a bone of contention. Two years before,
Zinzendorf had purchased, of Sir Hans Sloane, an old family mansion
with adjoining grounds, situated on the banks of the Thames at Chelsea.
The mansion was turned into a congregation house; a chapel was fitted
up; a burial ground was laid out; and gardens, and a terrace, facing
the Thames, were formed. The money expended was more than £11,000. In
April, 1753, the whole establishment of the _Unitas Fratrum_ removed
into the newly acquired premises; and Lindsey House, Chelsea, was
henceforth “the disciple house,”—the head quarters of the English
Moravians. All bishops and elders were subordinate to Zinzendorf, who,
under the name of “papa,” was exclusively the ruler of the church.
Meantime, an enormous debt had been incurred. Parliamentary
negotiations, sending brethren and sisters to the American colonies,
maintaining the preachers of country congregations, sustaining boarding
schools, and meeting the large expenses of Lindsey House,—created
pecuniary liabilities which the _Unitas Fratrum_ found it difficult to
meet. During the year 1749, and the first half of the year 1750, the
managers of the “diaconies” had advanced £13,000, and clamoured for
repayment. Zinzendorf tried to raise a loan of £30,000 for the English
Moravians, from the nobility of Upper Lusatia; but his effort failed.
A few of the London Brethren lent, from their own resources, nearly
£15,000, which merely met present wants. Zinzendorf and others were
in danger of arrest for debt. A crop of lawsuits sprung up. Thomas
Hankey was a creditor to the amount of nearly £19,000; and the Moravian
liabilities, ecclesiastical and trading, were altogether more than
£130,000. Affairs appeared to be involved in inextricable confusion.
Bankruptcy was imminent; disgrace was great. Peter Bohler, at the time,
was the minister in London, and did his utmost to calm the troubled
waters. Scandals of all kinds were rife; and even Bohler himself was
not exempt from the general censure,—a fact which led him, in March,
1753, to refuse to join with the Brethren in the holy communion, and
which probably had something to do with his leaving London for America
in the month of June ensuing.[184]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account