The life and times of the Rev. John Wesley, M.A., founder of the Methodists. Vol. 2 (of 3)Tyerman, L. (Luke)
History
The life and times of the Rev. John Wesley, M.A., founder of the Methodists. Vol. 2 (of 3)
Tyerman, L. (Luke)
Methodism; Wesley, John, 1703-1791
The great question was the necessity or propriety of the Methodists
separating from the Established Church, and of the Methodist itinerant
preachers administering the Christian sacraments. For years, there had
been dissatisfaction and grumbling. The people, in many instances, had
been repelled from the sacramental table in the church, and had been
driven to the alternative, of either receiving the Lord’s supper in
Dissenting chapels (where such an irregularity might be permitted), or
of absolutely committing sin by neglecting one of the most important
ordinances of the Christian system. No wonder, that the Methodists
were uneasy, and dissatisfied. No wonder, that not a few of Wesley’s
preachers, embracing nearly all the most pious and gifted, sighed for
some arrangement to meet the emergency created by their own success.
Among these were the two Perronets—Edward and Charles—men of education,
talent, and piety. Another was Thomas Walsh, pronounced by Wesley the
best biblical scholar he ever knew. The leader of the dissentient band
was Joseph Cownley, whom Wesley considered one of the best preachers
in England. These were men of mark and influence among their less
cultured brethren. They were as capable of forming correct opinions as
the two Wesleys were. They had a right to be heard; and it was hardly
fair to denounce them because they thought that the Methodists were
entitled to the sacraments of the Christian church; and that they, as
divinely called preachers of Christ’s religion, might be _permitted_ to
administer ordinances which that religion solemnly enjoined. Cownley,
Walsh, and the Perronets were right; but the time was scarcely come for
this to be acknowledged. To a great extent, the Church of England was
corrupt; it was also persecuting and repelling. What was there in such
a church to make Methodists and Methodist preachers long for continued
union with it?
Charles Wesley was irritated and fidgety to a most extraordinary
extent. With all the bigotry of the high churchmanship of the present
day, he seemed to think, and speak, and act as though salvation, out
of the Church of England, was impossible. This may be forgiven, but it
cannot be commended. He was unquestionably sincere; but his action, in
this affair, was intolerant and absurd. His brother, with a mind far
more equable, would probably have acted very differently from what he
did, if he had been unfettered, and uninfluenced by his friends. But
Charles worried him, and others puzzled him; and the result, as we have
already seen, was the agreement come to, after a three days’ discussion
by the conference of 1755, that, whether it was _lawful_ or not, it was
not _expedient_ for the Methodists to separate from the Established
Church.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account