The life and times of the Rev. John Wesley, M.A., founder of the Methodists. Vol. 3 (of 3)Tyerman, L. (Luke)
Religion
The life and times of the Rev. John Wesley, M.A., founder of the Methodists. Vol. 3 (of 3)
Tyerman, L. (Luke)
Methodism; Wesley, John, 1703-1791
Fletcher’s other publication, in 1772, was “Logica Genevensis; or, a
Fourth Check to Antinomianism: in which St. James’s pure religion is
defended against the charges, and established upon the concessions,
of Mr. Richard and Mr. Rowland Hill. In a Series of Letters to those
Gentlemen.” 12mo, 237 pages.[178]
It is no part of our present plan to give even the briefest analysis
of these masterly productions. Suffice it to say, that, for sound
scriptural argument, able exposition, lively imagination, elegance of
style, polished irony, and Christian temper, they have no superiors.
The two brothers, notwithstanding their goodness, their learning, their
genius, and their pluck, were but pigmies in the grasp of a Goliath.
Rowland Hill, a young man of twenty-seven, had experienced the
mortification of being refused ordination by not fewer than six
bishops, and was a roving evangelist, preaching with great success in
Whitefield’s London Tabernacle, in Bristol, Bath, and all over the west
of England. At the commencement of the controversy, Berridge wrote to
him thus: “The late contest at Bristol seems to turn upon this hinge,
whether it shall be _Pope John_ or _Pope Joan_. My dear friend, keep
out of all controversy, and wage no war but with the devil.”[179]
Unfortunately for himself, the young preacher did not follow the
counsel of the vicar of Everton, but, in 1772, issued an octavo
pamphlet of 71 pages, entitled “Friendly Remarks occasioned by the
Spirit and Doctrines contained in the Rev. Mr. Fletcher’s Vindication,
and more particularly in his Second Check to Antinomianism, to which is
added a Postscript, occasioned by his Third Check.” The production is
what might be expected from YOUNG Rowland Hill. Fletcher is accused of
using “tartness of style,” “banter,” “contempt,” “numberless sneers,
taunts, and sarcasms;” “infernal terms of darkness,” “bravado,”
“slander,” “high flown metaphors,” “frothy declamation,” “odious
appellations,” “glaring inconsistencies,” “palpable mistakes.” He says,
“Wesley has been a proverb for his contradictions for above thirty
years.” The “Hymns on God’s Everlasting Love,” “formerly sent forth
from the Foundery,” are stigmatised as “certain godly lampoons of
famous memory.” This was pretty strong to come from a stripling not yet
ordained.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account