The life and times of the Rev. John Wesley, M.A., founder of the Methodists. Vol. 3 (of 3)Tyerman, L. (Luke)
Religion
The life and times of the Rev. John Wesley, M.A., founder of the Methodists. Vol. 3 (of 3)
Tyerman, L. (Luke)
Methodism; Wesley, John, 1703-1791
Then follows a conversation, in which Wesley proposes to burn the
Calvinists in Smithfield, as Bonner once burnt the protestants, and the
devil promises, that, while Wesley shall be exalted “with state” to
heaven’s “third storey,” all the Whitefields and Hills shall be “turned
back from the gate.”
_Quantum sufficit!_ of Rowland Hill, both in prose and verse. What
had Wesley to say to all this? In his journal he writes: “1777, June
26--I read the truly wonderful performance of Mr. Rowland Hill. I stood
amazed! Compared to him, Mr. Toplady himself is a very civil, fair
spoken gentleman! June 27--I wrote an answer to it; ‘not rendering
railing for railing’ (I have not so learned Christ); but ‘speaking the
truth in love.’”
Wesley’s reply was a penny tract of 12 pages, 12mo, with the title, “An
Answer to Mr. Rowland Hill’s Tract, entitled, ‘Imposture Detected.’” He
begins as follows: “In the tract just published by Mr. Rowland Hill,
there are several _assertions_ which are _not true_. And the whole
pamphlet is wrote in an _unchristian_ and _ungentlemanly manner_. I
shall first set down the _assertions_ in order, and then proceed to
the _manner_.” This is the strongest language Wesley uses. Indeed, he
writes as though Hill’s pamphlet amused him rather than otherwise. Some
of his friends, however, were not so lenient. Thomas Olivers rushed to
the rescue, with his characteristic fire, and unmercifully put into
the hands of the public a sixpenny “Rod for the Reviler”; and Matthew
Goodenough, a mechanic, of Bishopsgate Street, published “A Letter to
Mr. Rowland Hill,” 12mo, 21 pages, in which he tells “the reviler” that
he had used a vindictive style of which a chimney sweep might properly
be ashamed; and, from his malign spirit and rude manner of attacking
Mr. Wesley, he might be mistaken for the chief of Billingsgate. Hill,
as a preacher, is taunted with ranting, and roaring, and squealing, and
bawling, and twisting, and twirling himself about like a merryandrew;
and is told that, though “a Pelagian Methodist stinks,” it was a
comfort that the name of Rowland Hill was “an odoriferous perfume, a
charming nosegay, diffusing its fragrance wherever it appears, and
sweetly and effectually extinguishing the fœtid exhalations of Pelagian
ordure!”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account