The life and times of the Rev. John Wesley, M.A., founder of the Methodists. Vol. 3 (of 3)Tyerman, L. (Luke)
Religion
The life and times of the Rev. John Wesley, M.A., founder of the Methodists. Vol. 3 (of 3)
Tyerman, L. (Luke)
Methodism; Wesley, John, 1703-1791
“But to speak freely: I myself find more life in the Church
prayers, than in any formal extemporary prayers of Dissenters.
Nay, I find more profit in sermons on either good tempers, or
good works, than in what are vulgarly called gospel sermons.
The term has now become a mere cant word: I wish none of our
society would use it. It has no determinate meaning. Let but a
pert, self sufficient animal, that has neither sense nor grace,
bawl out something about Christ, or His blood, or justification
by faith, and his hearers cry out, ‘What a fine gospel sermon!’
Surely the Methodists have not so learned Christ! We know no
gospel without salvation from sin. There is a Romish error
which many protestants swallow unawares. It is an avowed
doctrine of the Romish church, that the ‘pure intention of the
minister is essential to the validity of the sacraments.’ If
so, we ought not to attend the ministrations of an unholy man.
But in flat opposition to this, our Church teaches, in the
twenty-eighth article, that ‘the unworthiness of the minister
does not hinder the validity of the sacraments.’ Although,
therefore, there are many disagreeable circumstances, yet, I
advise all our friends to keep to the Church. God has surely
raised us up for the Church chiefly, that a little leaven may
leaven the whole lump. I wish you would seriously consider that
little tract, ‘Reasons against a Separation from the Church of
England.’ These reasons were never yet answered; I believe,
they never will.
“I am, my dear sister, yours very affectionately,
“JOHN WESLEY.”[315]
Whatever may be thought of the validity of Wesley’s reasons, there can
be no question, that, in theory at least, he was still firmly attached
to the Established Church. His enemies, not without reason, stigmatised
him as a Dissenter; he persisted, that he himself and the Methodists
were not Dissenters. Who is possessed of competent authority to decide
the doubt?
Before passing to Wesley’s publications, there is another matter which
deserves attention. One of the questions proposed at the conference of
1778 was,--“Is it not advisable for us to visit all the jails we can?”
The answer was,--“By all means. There cannot be a greater charity.”
From the first, this was a duty to which Wesley and his brother had
devoted themselves to the utmost of their power; and so also had many
of their preachers and followers, especially Silas Told, a man who
richly deserves a passing notice.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account