The life and times of the Rev. Samuel Wesley: Rector of Epworth and father of the Revs. John and Charles Wesley, the founders of the MethodistsTyerman, L. (Luke)
History
The life and times of the Rev. Samuel Wesley: Rector of Epworth and father of the Revs. John and Charles Wesley, the founders of the Methodists
Tyerman, L. (Luke)
Church of England -- Clergy -- Biography; Wesley, Samuel, 1662-1735
Samuel Wesley’s description of the morals of the city and of the nation
is appalling. In the sermon which he preached before the Society for the
Reformation of Manners, in 1698, he writes:—“Our infamous theatres seem
to have done more mischief to the faith and morals of the nation than
Hobbes himself. With as much reason may we exclaim against our plays and
interludes as did the old zealous fathers against the pagan spectacles,
and as justly rank these, as they did the others, among those pomps and
vanities which our baptism obliges us to renounce and to abhor. What
communion hath the temple of God with idols?—with those abominable
mysteries of iniquity, which outdo the old Fescenina of the heathen, the
lewd orgies of Bacchus, and the impious feasts of Isis and Priapus? I
know not how any person can profitably, or indeed decently, present
themselves here before God’s holy oracle, who frequent those schools of
vice, and mysteries of profaneness and lewdness, to unlearn _there_ what
they are taught _here_ out of God’s Holy Word. It is true the stage
pretends to reform manners; but let them tell us how many converts to
virtue and religion they have made during the last thirty or forty
years. We can give numerous and sad instances to the contrary. A brave
and virtuous nation has been too generally depraved and corrupted, and
nothing has more highly conduced to this than these insufferable and
abominable representations at theatres. If oaths; if blasphemy; if
perpetual profanation of the glorious name of God and of our blessed
Redeemer; if making a scoff and a laugh of His Holy Word and
institutions; if filthiness and foolish talking, and profane or immodest
jesting; if representing, excusing, and recommending the vices of
mankind; if teaching the people to think virtue ridiculous, and religion
fit for none but old people, fools, and lunatics; if contempt of
superiors; if false notions of honour; if lewdness, and pride, and
revenge, and even murder;—if these are the lessons which are daily
taught in the public play-houses, to the disgrace of our age, corruption
of our morals, and scandal of our nation, then we may fairly ask, Are
these fit places for the education of our youth, and the diversion of
those of riper years? or, indeed, are they fit places to be _tolerated_
under a Christian government?”[126]
-----
Footnote 126:
_Meth. Mag._, 1814, p. 729.
-----
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account