The life and times of the Rev. Samuel Wesley: Rector of Epworth and father of the Revs. John and Charles Wesley, the founders of the MethodistsTyerman, L. (Luke)
History
The life and times of the Rev. Samuel Wesley: Rector of Epworth and father of the Revs. John and Charles Wesley, the founders of the Methodists
Tyerman, L. (Luke)
Church of England -- Clergy -- Biography; Wesley, Samuel, 1662-1735
What was the result of all this? The greatest bitterness was created,
and pamphlets, full of scurrility and violence, literally swarmed. Among
the writers of these productions, Daniel Defoe was the most eminent. The
pamphlet which, above all others, occasioned the greatest commotion, was
his “Shortest Way with Dissenters; or, Proposals for the Establishment
of the Church.” This was published anonymously, and pretended to be
written by one of the High Church party, and to set forth their
complaints and wishes. The Church is said to have harboured Dissenters
too long, and to have nourished the viperous brood till they hissed and
flew in the face of the mother that had cherished them. The Church had
been huffed and bullied by the Act of Toleration, and canting synagogues
had been set up at its very doors. The Dissenters had butchered one
king, deposed another, and made a mock monarch of a third, and yet
expected to be employed by the fourth. If James I. had sent all the
Puritans in England away to the West Indies, the Church of England would
have been kept undivided and entire; but these Puritans, to requite the
lenity of the father, took up arms against the son, put to death God’s
anointed, and set up a sordid impostor who had neither the title nor the
understanding to manage the nation. Coming into power, they shared the
church lands among their soldiers, and turned the clergy out to starve.
During the reign of their own King William, they had crept into all
places of trust and profit, and had been preferred to the highest posts
in England; while, in Scotland, they had trampled down the sacred
orders, suppressed the Episcopacy, and made an entire conquest of the
Church. For such reasons, they ought to be rooted out from the face of
the land, and never would the nation enjoy uninterrupted union and
tranquillity till their spirit of Whiggism, faction, and schism were
melted down like the old money. It was true, that Queen Anne had
promised them toleration, but she had also promised to protect and
defend the Church; and if she could not effectually do that without the
destruction of the Dissenters, she must, of course, dispense with one
promise in order to fulfil the other. The Parliament, protected and
encouraged by a Church of England queen, had now the opportunity to
suppress the spirit of enthusiasm, and to free the nation from the
vipers that had so long sucked the blood of their mother. If they were
permitted to remain, they would corrupt posterity, plunder the estates
of the members of the Church, drag their persons to gaols, gibbets, and
scaffolds, and swallow up the Church itself in schism, faction, and
enthusiasm. If one severe law were made and executed, that all found at
a conventicle should be transported, and their preacher be hanged, they
would soon all come to church, and an age would make all parties one
again. Why should an enthusiast be less a criminal than a Jesuit? Why
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account