Meanwhile the Emperor Charles had arrived in Germany and opened the
Imperial Diet at Augsburg in person, in the summer of 1530. Here they,
who were supposed to favor Zwingli's views, were in very ill repute.
"On all sides," Jacob Sturm wrote to him, "we are suspected, as though
we were hatching with foreign nations some marvellously dangerous plot
for the overthrow of the Emperor and the Empire; yea, we are regarded
as open rebels. Thou knowest how thoroughly false this is; yet there
are some who, therefore, wish also to hear nothing about our articles
of faith, because, they say, the report goes;[7] that some of us have
boasted, that we have provisions, arms and soldiers enough, not only to
repel force with force, but also to invade the territory of our
neighbors. There are those who affirm that we have already portioned
out among ourselves the ecclesiastical principalities, before the
victory, and I know not what other follies. In short, the Papists, and
even those who otherwise have declared themselves for the Gospel, act
against us here, openly and secretly, so that our destruction would be
decided on, if it only depended on them. If the Lord himself does not
pity us, does not stand by innocence and truth, then will our mighty
and raging foes yet devour us alive. No one defends us more than the
_Landgrave_, and even he does not venture to do it publicly, but only
to advocate our cause in narrower circles. To us, ears and access are
completely closed; we are crippled in all our members. From an appeal
in person, or from thy servants here, whom thou couldst entrust with
the Gospel, there is nothing to hope; should circumstances meanwhile
take a more favorable turn, I will send you word." And yet the
_Landgrave_ of Hesse, in a special conference with the Emperor, had
fearlessly defended himself and his friends, without however giving
among them the name of Zwingli, a confession of faith from whose hand
had just then reached Augsburg, and was viewed with the greatest
displeasure. The ingenious Switzer had woven into it some passages of a
political nature, which, though cautiously done, in his opinion, could
not but produce an unfavorable impression in the Imperial Court, as it
then stood. It contains among other things: "I well know that the
ruler, chosen or appointed in a lawful manner, occupies the place of
God, no less than the priest; but as the priest should be a minister of
heavenly wisdom and goodness, to defend the faith and bring errors to
light, so also should the ruler be a minister of divine goodness and
justice; goodness, in that he listens to and cares for his subjects
with fidelity and self-sacrifice, like God; justice, in that he holds
in check the impious and wicked and protects the innocent. If he does
this, then he preserves a quiet conscience, and has indeed nothing to
fear; if he does it not, and thus surrounds himself with fear and
terror, I cannot think that his conscience will be idle, only because
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account