The Life and Work of James A. Garfield, Twentieth President of the United States: Embracing an Account of the Scenes and Incidents of His Boyhood; the Struggles of His Youth; the Might of His Early Manhood; His Valor As a Soldier; His Career As a Statesman; His Election to the Presidency; and the Tragic Story of His Death.Ridpath, John Clark
History
The Life and Work of James A. Garfield, Twentieth President of the United States: Embracing an Account of the Scenes and Incidents of His Boyhood; the Struggles of His Youth; the Might of His Early Manhood; His Valor As a Soldier; His Career As a Statesman; His Election to the Presidency; and the Tragic Story of His Death.
Ridpath, John Clark
Garfield, James A. (James Abram), 1831-1881
Of the general results of the battle, we quote from Van Horn’s
magnificent but critical _History of the Army of the Cumberland_:
“Whatever were the immediate and more local consequences of the battle,
in its remote relations and significance, it has claims to historic
grandeur. The Army of the Cumberland, without support on either flank,
had leaped across the Tennessee River and the contiguous mountains, and
yet escaped destruction, though the armies of the enemy, east and west,
were made tributary to a combination of forces to accomplish this end.
Paroled prisoners from Vicksburg, regular troops from Mississippi and
Georgia, a veteran corps from Lee’s army in Virginia, and Buckner’s
corps from East Tennessee, joined Bragg on the banks of the Chickamauga,
not simply to retake Chattanooga, but to annihilate the Army of the
Cumberland. Nearly half of Bragg’s army consisted of recent
reinforcements, sent to Northern Georgia _while the authorities at
Washington, perplexed with the military situation, were resting under
the delusion that General Bragg was reinforcing Lee_. But this heavy
draft upon the resources of the Confederacy was burdened with the
fatality which clung to all the grander efforts of the insurgents in the
west. And General Bragg’s broken and exhausted army was a symbol of the
fast-coming exhaustion of the Confederacy itself. The issue of the
battle was not thus defined to the consciousness of the Southern people,
but was, doubtless, one of the most emphatic disappointments of the
struggle, and intensified the gloom produced by previous defeats.”
In his report of the battle to the Department of War, General Rosecrans
said:
“To Brigadier-General James A. Garfield, chief of staff, I am
especially indebted for the clear and ready manner in which he
seized the points of action and movement, and expressed in orders
the ideas of the general commanding.”
In relating the history of General Garfield’s military career, no
mention has been made of a fact which was destined to affect his future.
In the fall of 1862, he had been nominated and elected to Congress from
his own district. The thing had been accomplished in his absence, and
almost without his knowledge. His term did not begin till December,
1863, and his constituents supposed the war would be over before that
time. Garfield himself looked at the thing with indifference. It did not
interfere with his service in the army, could not do so for a long time,
and there was nothing to hurry his decision in the matter. After the
Tullahoma campaign, in the summer of 1863, when he had had a taste of
successful military strategy, the Congressional question began to force
itself to the surface of his thought. There was no prospect of peace.
All his inclinations persuaded him to remain in the army. But Congress
met in December, and he would have to decide.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account