The Life and Work of James A. Garfield, Twentieth President of the United States: Embracing an Account of the Scenes and Incidents of His Boyhood; the Struggles of His Youth; the Might of His Early Manhood; His Valor As a Soldier; His Career As a Statesman; His Election to the Presidency; and the Tragic Story of His Death.Ridpath, John Clark
History
The Life and Work of James A. Garfield, Twentieth President of the United States: Embracing an Account of the Scenes and Incidents of His Boyhood; the Struggles of His Youth; the Might of His Early Manhood; His Valor As a Soldier; His Career As a Statesman; His Election to the Presidency; and the Tragic Story of His Death.
Ridpath, John Clark
Garfield, James A. (James Abram), 1831-1881
“I have been surprised that in so lengthy and able a discussion, so
little reference has been made to the merits of the resolution
itself. In the wide range of discussion, the various theories of the
legal and political status of the rebellious States have been
examined. It is, perhaps, necessary that we take ground upon that
question, as preliminary to the discussion of the resolution itself.
Two theories, widely differing from each other, have been proposed;
but I can not consider either of them as wholly correct. I can not
agree with the distinguished gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr.
Stevens,) who acknowledges that these States are out of the Union,
and now constitute a foreign people; nor can I, on the other hand,
agree with those who believe that the insurgent States are not only
in the Union, but have lost none of their rights under the
Constitution and laws of the Union.
“When the Government of the United States declared that we were in a
state of war, the rebel States came under the laws of war. By their
acts of rebellion and war, they had swept away every vestige of
their civil and political rights under the Constitution of the
United States. Their obligations still remained; but the reciprocal
rights, which usually accompany obligations, they had forfeited.
“The question then lies open before us: In a state of war, under the
laws of war, is this resolution legal and politic? I insist, Mr.
Speaker, that the question involved in the resolution before this
House, is whether this Government, in its exercise of its rights of
a belligerent under the laws of war, can not punish these rebels and
confiscate their estates, both personal and real, for life and
forever. That is the only question before us.
“I conclude by returning once more to the resolution before us. Let
no weak sentiments of misplaced sympathy deter us from inaugurating
a measure, which will cleanse our nation and make it the fit home of
freedom and glorious manhood. Let us not despise the severe wisdom
of our revolutionary fathers when they served their generation in a
similar way. Let the Republic drive from its soil the traitors that
have conspired against its life, as God and His angels drove Satan
and his host from heaven. He was not too merciful to be just, and to
hurl down in chains and everlasting darkness the ‘traitor angel’ who
rebelled against Him.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account