That the translation of the word Κραταυς, in the celebrated passage
of Sisyphus, should have met with indulgence from those who insist
on the preservation of _Outis_, may not be matter of surprise,
because, as Mr. C. observes, 'it is now perhaps impossible to
ascertain with precision what Homer meant by the word κραταυς,
which he only uses here and in the next book, where it is the name
of Scylla's dam.' We give it up too, though not willingly, because
the ancients appear to have been as ignorant of the being so called
as ourselves; some of whom, by cutting the word into two, attempted
to make it rather an attribute of the stone itself, than the effect
of some external power: but from _him_, we are more surprised at
the observation on the word 'ἀναιδης,' in the same passage, as
'also of very doubtful explication.' Is it not the constant
practice of Homer to diffuse energy by animating the inanimate? has
he forgotten the maddening lances, the greedy arrows, the roaring
shores, the groaning earth, the winged words, the cruel brass, and
a thousand other metaphors from life? and if these occurred not to
his memory, the observation of _Aristotle_ on the passage in
question, as quoted by Clarke, might have removed all doubts about
the true sense of the word ἀναιδης, when applied to a rock.
Mr. Cowper, in his interpretation of many words and expressions of
dubious explication, has generally chosen that sense which seemed
most to contribute to the perspicuity of the passage: thus in
Iliad, iv. v. 306, seq. when Nestor instructs his troops before the
battle, he has, in our opinion, adopted the best and only sense,
though rejected by Clarke, with more subtilty than reason. Thus he
has substituted the word 'monster' for the epithet ἀμαιμακετος,
Iliad, xvi. 329, with sufficient propriety, whether that word be
expressive of enormity of dimension, or untameableness of
disposition; in both which senses it occurs in Pindar.[28] We might
enlarge on the terms ἀμητροχιτωνας; τροπαι Ἠελιοιο; ορσοθυρη, and a
variety of others equally disputed or obscure; but as they will be
sufficiently recognized by the scholar, whilst the unlearned reader
is enabled to pass smoothly over them, we shall just observe, that
the interpretation of the proverbial passage in Odyss. viii. v.
351,
Δειλαι τοι δειλων γε και ἐγγυαι ἐγγυαασθαι
'Lame suitor, lame security,'
is the happiest instance of the superiority of plain sense over
learning merely intricate.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account