The Life & Letters of Peter Ilich TchaikovskyChaikovskii, Modest
General
The Life & Letters of Peter Ilich Tchaikovsky
Chaikovskii, Modest
Composers -- Russia -- Biography; Tchaikovsky, Peter Ilich, 1840-1893
About the same time, Bilse brought forward _Francesca da Rimini_ in
Berlin. Here, where Russian music had such propagandists as Hans von
Bülow and Klindworth, Tchaikovsky was not altogether unknown; but
although some of his works, like the Andante from the first quartet,
were almost popular, yet the composer had been regarded with a certain
disdain, and almost ignored by the majority of the German critics. This
time it was different. On the same evening as _Francesca_, Bilse also
conducted Brahms’s Second Symphony, which, being a novelty, drew all the
musical lights of Berlin to the concert. It was only thanks to these
circumstances that _Francesca_ was not entirely passed over by the
critics. The Press split into two camps: one stood up for Brahms and
attacked Tchaikovsky, the other took the opposite view. The hostile
party was the stronger. Richard Würst called the work “a musical
monstrosity.”[64] “We know,” he continued, “a few songs, pianoforte
pieces, and a Cossack fantasia (?) by this composer; these compositions
bear the stamp of an original talent, but are not pleasing on the whole.
In the Symphonic Fantasia (_Francesca_) this unpleasantness is so
obvious as to make us forget the originality of the composer. The first
and last allegros, which depict the whirlwinds of hell, have neither
subjects nor ideas, but only a mass of sounds, and these earsplitting
effects seem to us, from an artistic point of view, too much even for
hell itself. The middle section, which describes the unhappy fate of
Francesca, Paolo, and myself, shows--in spite of its endless length--at
least some trace of catching melody.” Another critic, O. Lumprecht
(_National Zeitung_, September 17th, 1878), applies to _Francesca_ such
terms as “madness,” “musical contortions,” etc.
Among the friendly party _Francesca_ was favourably compared to the
Brahms Symphony, especially by Moszkowski. Among private opinions should
be mentioned that of Hans von Bülow, who wrote to Tchaikovsky shortly
after the performance that he was far more charmed with _Francesca_ than
with _Romeo and Juliet_. Kotek says that Joachim was pleased with the
work in spite of his prepossession in favour of his friend Brahms, while
Max Bruch when asked his opinion of _Francesca_ replied: “I am far too
stupid to criticise such music.” In spite of the over-ruling of
unfavourable criticism, and its mediocre success with the public, Bilse
had the courage to repeat _Francesca da Rimini_ in the course of the
same season.
* * * * *
Early in September Tchaikovsky returned to Moscow to take up his duties
at the Conservatoire. His quarters were already prepared for him.
Nevertheless, before returning to the town he had once loved and
believed to be a necessary part of his happiness, he had already
resolved “to leave it again at the earliest opportunity.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account