Belasco, David, 1853-1931; Theater -- United States
executant in art--and he sought to obtain an engagement at the
California Theatre to play the same “line of parts” (as the phrase goes
among old stock company actors) which he had performed in the preceding
Spring with Barry Sullivan. Though he failed in that effort--and was
keenly disappointed thereby--he was not to be balked in his purpose, and
got himself employed, during the Booth engagement, as a super. “I could
not give _every_ night to such work,” he has told me; “but I ’walked on’
with him, at least once, in every play he did,--and in ’Hamlet,’
’Richelieu,’ and ’Julius Cæsar’ I think I went on at every performance.
In ’Cæsar’ when Booth played _Cassius_ McCullough was the _Brutus_ and
Thomas W. Keene the
[Illustration:
EDWIN BOOTH AS _HAMLET_
“_There’s something in his soul_
_O’er which his melancholy sits on brood._”
--Act III, sc. 1
Photograph by Sarony. Authors’s Collection.]
_Antony_; when Booth played _Brutus_ McCullough was _Cassius_; when
Booth was _Antony_ Keene was _Cassius_ and McCullough went back to
_Brutus_. We used to wish we had Lawrence Barrett there for
_Cassius_--but ’Tom’ Keene was a fine actor in his way, and I shall
never forget those performances of ’Cæesar,’ nor those of ’Othello,’ in
which Booth and McCullough alternated as _Othello_ and _Iago_. Booth was
my _great_ idol; the one actor who, for me, could surpass McCullough,
Barrett, and Montgomery. I found him very uneven--that is, his
performances were not always up to his own standard. But, when he was
really ’in the vein,’ there was _nobody_ like him; there never has been,
and there never will be! I never heard such a voice,--so full of fire,
feeling, and power,--and I never saw such eyes as Booth’s, when he
played _King Richard the Third_, _Richelieu_, or _Iago_. At first I used
to go to the California to watch his rehearsals, but I soon found out it
was little use. The plays were all an old story to him and he wouldn’t
rehearse. McCullough had Booth’s prompt books, and Booth left the
company pretty much to him and just ’ran through’ the big scenes with
the principals. He was very gentle, considerate, and kind to everybody,
but he seldom said much unless spoken to. I valued my acquaintance with
him greatly; I never missed an opportunity to see him, and I cherish
his memory as that of one of the best of men and greatest of actors.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account