Belasco, David, 1853-1931; Theater -- United States
“...Of course Belasco went to Erlanger’s house and was a
suppliant to the tender mercy of Erlanger to permit him to hire
theatres in which to produce his play. He went there because the
Syndicate’s unholy and criminal alliance which controlled the
principal theatres throughout the country had made it impossible
for any man with a play, a company, scenery, costumes, and all the
requirements for a complete production to book his play (which
means to find a roof under which to produce it) except by the grace
of Klaw & Erlanger, who controlled the Syndicate and the theatres.
And they could ask just such proportion of the profits by way of
rent and impose such other conditions as they chose. Of course
Belasco went to Erlanger’s house, and when he confronted ‘the great
man’ he not only agreed to pay the rent, generally _fifty per cent.
or more of the gross receipts_ of every performance, for the
theatres, but he was also forced to agree to give secretly to Klaw
& Erlanger under cover of Brooks’ name fifty per cent. of all the
profits of that production. No wonder Erlanger did not want that
little arrangement known to his Syndicate
[Illustration:
Photograph by Byron. Belasco’s Collection.
THE CROWNING ROOM,--BELASCO’S PRODUCTION OF “ADREA”]
partners! Why should not Belasco go to Erlanger and smilingly
consent to be fleeced? His venture was ruined unless Erlanger would
furnish ‘bookings’ on any terms Erlanger chose to extort. Should
the King go to the Beggar? Or was it meet that Belasco the Beggar
for a chance to pay for the use of theatres in which to produce his
own play with his own company, should go humbly to Erlanger, the
King of the Syndicate that controlled the theatres?
“No such despotism has ever been known or dreamed of in this
country and none so fatal to the development of art as the evidence
discloses this Theatrical Syndicate. Every monopoly that has been
dragged into the court pales into insignificance and seems almost
harmless beside it. Every owner of a theatre contracted with
throughout the country was required to agree not to permit his
theatre to be used for any performance not under the direction [of]
or assented to by the Syndicate even during the times it was not in
use or being paid for by the Syndicate!...”
CONVERTING CONVENTION HALL:--“ADREA” IN WASHINGTON.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account