The Life of Duty, v. 2: A year's plain sermons on the Gospels or EpistlesWilmot-Buxton, H. J. (Harry John)
Religion
The Life of Duty, v. 2: A year's plain sermons on the Gospels or Epistles
Wilmot-Buxton, H. J. (Harry John)
Bible. Epistles -- Commentaries; Bible. Gospels -- Commentaries; Sermons, English
It is for this reason that we build beautiful Churches, and decorate
them with stained glass windows, and rich carvings. Such Churches are
thank-offerings, signs of our gratitude to Him who on earth was
homeless, who was born in a stable, who had not where to lay His head.
There are people who murmur at the expense of building and decorating
such Churches. They say, "To what purpose was this waste?" They are
very nearly related to Judas Iscariot of old, who asked the same
question, and, like him, they love themselves, and the money bag,
better than their Master. These people tell us that God does not care
for handsome Churches and stately services. So they would give the
Almighty a white-washed building, whilst they dwell in a fair and
costly mansion. They would have fine damask and soft covering for
their table, whilst they have dirty linen and a moth eaten cloth for
the Altar of their God. They will drink out of cut-glass and silver at
their feasts, and they leave the feast of Christ's dying love, the
Blessed Sacrament of praise and thanksgiving, to be celebrated in
vessels of base metal. Their houses are kept in excellent repair, and
cleansed by careful hands, but they suffer the House of God to fall to
decay, and allow His Presence Chamber to be defiled with dirt. And all
this arises from a want of thankfulness to God. If we are thankful we
do not grudge what we give, we feel that we can never do enough for Him
who has redeemed us. But these people say, "God does not care for a
beautiful Church, He loves simplicity." Where has God told us this?
David believed just the opposite. He said that he was ashamed that he
should dwell in a house of cedars, whilst the Ark of God dwelt among
curtains. You know how he was prevented from building the Temple, and
how Solomon did the work. Now, did Solomon act upon the mean principle
of building a poor, cheap house for God, whilst he erected a gorgeous
palace for himself? No! the Temple was one of the most glorious
buildings ever seen, and those that were erected in later times were
splendid also. We find our Blessed Lord attending the Temple services,
and those services were beautiful and elaborate. There was nothing in
the Temple or its worship to suggest that God prefers the ugly,
white-washed building, and the slovenly, irreverent, service which some
would offer Him.
If you love someone very dearly you do not visit him in your oldest and
dirtiest garments, you do not send him the cheapest present you can
buy, nor put up a roughly erected tombstone to his memory. You give
him the very best you have. If you love God you will do the same to
Him.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account