The Life of Florence Nightingale, vol. 1 of 2Cook, Edward Tyas, Sir
History
The Life of Florence Nightingale, vol. 1 of 2
Cook, Edward Tyas, Sir
Nightingale, Florence, 1820-1910
(_To Madame Mohl._) _July_ 26 [1848]. In London there have been the
usual amount of Charity Balls, Charity Concerts, Charity Bazaars,
whereby people bamboozle their consciences and shut their eyes.
Nevertheless there does not seem the slightest prospect of a
revolution here. Why, would be hard to say, as England is surely
the country where luxury has reached its height and poverty its
depth. Perhaps it is our Poor Law, perhaps the strength of our
Middle Class, perhaps a greater degree of sympathy between the rich
and poor, which is the conservative principle. Lord Ashley had a
Chartist deputation with him the other day, who stayed to tea and
talked with him for five hours. "That a man should ride in a
carriage and have twenty thousand a year is contrary to the laws of
Nature," said their leader, and slapped his leg. "I could show you,
if you would go with me to-night," said Lord Ashley, "people who
would say to _you_, that a man should go in broadcloth and wear a
shirt-pin (pointing to the Chartist's shirt) is contrary to the
laws of Nature." The Chartist was silent. "And it was the only
thing I said," says Lord Ashley, "after arguing with them for five
hours which made the least impression."
Her acquaintance with Lord Ashley (afterwards Lord Shaftesbury) brought
her in touch with Ragged School work. But society grew more and more
distasteful to Miss Nightingale. She explained the reasons in a letter
to her "Aunt Hannah." Why could she not smile and be gay, while yet
biding her time and not forsaking her ultimate ideals? It was, she said,
because she "hated God to hear her laugh, as if she had not repented of
her sin." There is something obviously morbid in such words, and they
might be multiplied indefinitely, if there were good reason for doing
so, from her letters, diaries, and note-books. The sins of which she
most often convicted herself were "hypocrisy" and "vanity." She prayed
to be delivered from "the desire of producing an effect." That was the
"vanity"; and it was "hypocrisy," because she was playing a part,
responding to friends' conception of her, though all the while her heart
was really set on other things, and her true life was being lived
elsewhere. The morbidness was a symptom of a mind at war with its
surroundings. Then again the kind "Aunt" reminded her, in the spirit of
George Herbert, that anything and everything may be done "to the glory
of God." But Miss Nightingale at this time was deep in the study of
political economy; and "can it be to the glory of God," she asked, "when
there is so much misery among the poor, which we might be curing instead
of living in luxury?"
V
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account