"We, the undersigned, by the Grace of God, Cardinals of the Holy
Roman Church, Inquisitors General throughout the whole Christian
Republic, Special Deputies of the Holy Apostolical Chair against
heretical depravity,
"Whereas you, Galileo, son of the late Vincenzo Galilei of Florence,
aged seventy years, were denounced in 1615 to this Holy Office, for
holding as true a false doctrine taught by many, namely, that the
sun is immoveable in the centre of the world, and that the earth
moves, and also with a diurnal motion; also, for having pupils whom
you instructed in the same opinions; also, for maintaining a
correspondence on the same with some German mathematicians; also for
publishing certain letters on the solar spots, in which you
developed the same doctrine as true; also, for answering the
objections which were continually produced from the Holy Scriptures,
by glozing the said Scriptures according to your own meaning; and
whereas thereupon was produced the copy of a writing, in form of a
letter, professedly written by you to a person formerly your pupil,
in which, following the hypotheses of Copernicus, you include
several propositions contrary to the true sense and authority of the
Holy Scripture: therefore this holy tribunal being desirous of
providing against the disorder and mischief which was thence
proceeding and increasing to the detriment of the holy faith, by the
desire of His Holiness, and of the Most Eminent Lords Cardinals of
this supreme and universal Inquisition, the two propositions of the
stability of the sun, and motion of the earth, were _qualified_ by
the _Theological Qualifiers_ as follows:
"_1st. The proposition that the Sun is in the centre of the world
and immoveable from its place, is absurd, philosophically false, and
formally heretical; because it is expressly contrary to the Holy
Scripture._
"_2dly. The proposition that the Earth is not the centre of the
world, nor immoveable, but that it moves, and also with a diurnal
motion, is also absurd, philosophically false, and, theologically
considered, at least erroneous in faith._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account