To this reasoning respecting the inherent right of government to employ all the means requisite to the execution of its specified powers, it is objected, that none but _necessary_ and _proper_ means can be employed; and none can be _necessary_, but those without which the grant of the power would be nugatory. So far has this restrictive interpretation been pressed as to make the case of _necessity_ which shall warrant the constitutional exercise of a power, to depend on casual and temporary circumstances; an idea, which alone confutes the construction. The expedience of exercising a particular power, at a particular time, must indeed depend on circumstances, but the constitutional right of exercising it must be uniform and invariable. All the arguments, therefore, drawn from the accidental existence of certain state banks which happen to exist to-day, and for aught that concerns the government of the United States may disappear to-morrow, must not only be rejected as fallacious, but must be viewed as demonstrative that there is a radical source of error in the reasoning. But it is essential to the being of the government that so erroneous a conception of the meaning of the word _necessary_ should be exploded. It is certain that neither the grammatical nor popular sense of the term requires that construction. According to both, _necessary_ often means no more than _needful, requisite, incidental, useful_, or _conducive to_. It is a common mode of expression to say that it is necessary for a government or a person to do this or that thing, where nothing more is intended or understood than that the interests of the government or person require, or will be promoted by doing this or that thing. This is the true sense in which the word is used in the constitution. The whole turn of the clause containing it indicates an intent to give by it a liberal latitude to the exercise of the specified powers. The expressions have peculiar comprehensiveness. They are "to make _all laws_ necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and _all other_ powers vested by the constitution in the government of the United States, or in any _department_ or _office_ thereof." To give the word "necessary" the restrictive operation contended for, would not only depart from its obvious and popular sense, but would give it the same force as if the word _absolutely_ or _indispensably_ had been prefixed to it.