If the leaders of the land movement are wise, they will not endeavour
to hold meetings. They should declare that public meeting has been
rendered impossible by the Crimes Act; and they should, as an act of
charity, collect funds to aid all who have been evicted, no matter
from what cause, and thus band the Irish tenants together in a
friendly society. At the same time, they should devote all their
energies to increase their numbers in the next Parliament, and they
should submit test questions to every Liberal standing for an English
constituency where there are Irish voters, and make these votes
dependent upon the manner in which the questions are answered. If
Mr. Parnell can {189} hold the balance in Parliament between the
rival aspirants for the Treasury Bench, he may be certain that any
just demand that he may make will be granted. The democracy of
England and Ireland, with Mr. Gladstone at their head, would make
short work of Conservative and Whig obstructive trash. The landlords
in Ireland and the Whigs in England stand in the way of peace and
tranquillity in the former island, and of mutual good feeling in
both.[8]
To quote Mr. Labouchere's views on Ireland during the dark and gloomy
period which followed the introduction of the Prevention of Crimes
Bill is to quote Mr. Chamberlain's, for, as is seen by their constant
correspondence, the two were one in their views on Irish discontent.
Mr. Chamberlain made a speech at Swansea in February, 1883, in which
he asked his audience how long they supposed Englishmen with their
free institutions would tolerate the existence of an Irish Poland so
near to their own shores. Was separation the only alternative? He
thought not. Separation, in his opinion, would "jeopardise the
security of this country, and would be fatal to the prosperity and
happiness of Ireland." He, like Labouchere, was prepared to relax
the bond, even by conceding what was then known as Home Rule, which
would not include an independent Parliament or a separate
executive.[9]
However, in 1883 and 1884, Englishmen had other things to occupy
their minds than the rights and wrongs of Ireland. In order to
follow the political career of Mr. Labouchere we must for a time
leave the Irish question and consider "the policy of Gladstone's
Government in Egypt."
[1] _Northampton Mercury_, March 27, 1880.
[2] _Hansard_, Jan. 27, 1881, vol. 257.
[3] _Hansard_, Feb. 25, 1881, vol. 258.
[4] To their credit, be it said, they generally were amused.
[5] _Hansard_. Feb. 25, 1881, vol. 258.
[6] R. Barry O'Brien, _Life of Parnell_.
[7] _Hansard_, May 14, 1881.
[8] _Truth_, July 6, 1882.
[9] S. H. Jeyes, _Mr. Chamberlain_.
{190}
CHAPTER IX
LABOUCHERE AND MR. GLADSTONE'S EGYPTIAN POLICY
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account