As regards the present situation he said that there never was
anything which could be called a treaty with the Conservatives, but
that there was an understanding that, if they helped the Tories to
turn out the late Government, and generally supported them during the
remainder of the Session, there was to be no coercion. "Churchill
talks to us vaguely about Home Rule, but we do not pay much attention
to this. We are now paying our debt that we have incurred."
According to present arrangements, the Party is to put out a
manifesto calling upon all Irish in England to vote solid for the
Conservative candidates. This policy was adopted, he continued, in
order to hold the balance. {255} I went into figures to show him
that we should win without the Irish, and said that the balance
policy would only end in their tying themselves to a corpse.
He admitted that this was possible, and said that personally his
sympathies were with the Radicals, but that it was impossible to
trust the Liberal party, and to hope that the Liberal party could do
anything even if they wished to, owing to the House of Lords. "No
alliance," I said, "is worth anything which is not based upon mutual
interest. We shall win at the election, but we shall have to count
with the Whigs. The English electors will be indignant at your
conduct, and we shall naturally take our revenge on you for your
supporting the Tories. Now, if you would join us, we should be
strong enough to hold our own against Whigs and Tories. We want your
votes in the House of Commons; you will find that you will do nothing
without ours. What do you say to Chamberlain's scheme of Home Rule
in the _Fortnightly_? He said: "... there are ... some things that I
object to in it, but Chamberlain could not carry it. Even if he got
it through the House of Commons, the Lords would throw it out."[5]
Well, we went on discussing. At last he said: "Can we have any
assurance that Chamberlain's scheme would be one on which a Radical
or Liberal Ministry would stand or fall? Will Gladstone declare for
it?" "What would you do if you could be certain of a big scheme
forming part of the Liberal platform?" I asked. "Our party really is
guided by about six men. What we decide," he said, "the others
accept. I would propose that we do not compromise ourselves with the
Tories, that we should issue no manifesto, leaving Irish electors to
vote as they like. When the plan is put forth in the next
Parliament, we should have to say that it does not go far enough,
etc., but it might merely be a dummy opposition. Whether I could
carry this I don't know, but I think that I could." ... Finally he
said that he would be back at the commencement of August, and that,
if any arrangement could be made, he would do his best to further it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account