I was glad to read Childers' speech, which produced an excellent
impression here by its moderation and practicalness. With regard to
a plan, Parnell asked Sexton and myself to try and draw up something,
but we were so busy--that without a good library, which we have not
here, easily available, the task is appalling. Parnell's idea is to
abolish the Lord Lieutenancy, strike a financial balance between the
two countries, giving, as our Imperial quota, an average on ten
years' returns of Irish contributions with the cost of ruling Ireland
deducted. This would get rid of the Irish Parliament voting or
refusing supplies, as the sum would be a fixed one, and if we did not
pay it we could {261} very easily be compelled. He would be for
retaining the Irish members at Westminster, and I suppose there would
not be much trouble in the arrangement being made in that case, that
they should be summoned by the Speaker to debate affairs which he
declared Imperial or Irish, and in the English Legislature taking
them at a particular period of the Session for the sake of
convenience. I think we should have full power over everything here
except the Army and the Navy, as I cannot see what other interest
England has here. If we pay her a due taxation, what possible care
of hers is it how else we order our affairs? As for the minority,
the Protestants would soon realise they were safe with the Catholics
(and they would be the pets of our people). Let there be, by all
means, every guarantee given for their protection however. If the
Tories come in they would give us Protection, I am sure, but would
stipulate for terms for the landlords.--Faithfully yours,
T. M. HEALY.
_Mr. Labouchere to Mr. Chamberlain_
10 QUEEN ANNE'S GATE, Oct. 18, 1885.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account