It is sufficiently difficult to prevent over zealous committee men
and agents from compromising their candidate during the election;
but, if he is to be retrospectively responsible for all their
previous acts, I venture to say that no candidate can expect to hold
his seat against a petition. Were the retrospective responsibility
introduced into the procedure of courts of law no man would be safe.
I might, sir, to-morrow have the advantage of making your
acquaintance. Some days later I might take a servant whom you had
formerly employed. Ought I to be hung if it were subsequently shown
that you and the servant had murdered some one last January in
London, while I was in Italy?
Were I still a member of the Legislature, I should myself point out
the necessity of a reform in the composition of election {80}
committees. As an elector of Westminster, I shall, through my
representative, Capt. Grosvenor, present a petition to the House of
Commons praying that some alteration be made in the present system,
and that a properly qualified judge be added to every committee to
explain the elementary principles of jurisprudence to
well-intentioned gentlemen who know nothing about them.[3]--I am,
Sir, Your obedient servant,
H. LABOUCHERE.
A number of extremely interesting letters appeared in the _Times_, on
the subject of the New Windsor Election Petition, one other, only, of
which I shall quote, as it puts the case for Mr. Labouchere and his
colleagues in a perfectly clear light. It runs as follows:
SIR,--My name having prominently appeared in the proceeding before
the Election Committee in this case, and in communications made to
you by Sir Henry Hoare and Mr. Labouchere, complaining of the
decision of the committee, I trust you will not refuse me an
opportunity of corroborating their statements. I may say, as a
prelude, that the agents had the most distinct directions to do
nothing in contradiction of the statutes relating to the election of
members to serve in Parliament, and I proved, in evidence, my written
instructions to that effect.
Sir Henry Hoare and Mr. Labouchere, being aware that Mr. Flower had
retired by reason of his belief that he had been compromised by his
agents, were most anxious to avoid becoming in any way identified
with their proceedings; and, as regards the public houses, which had
been taken on his behalf, the late members entirely repudiated, both
personally, and through me, having anything whatever to do with them.
No one had authority to hire committee rooms but Mr. Last, the head
agent at Windsor, and no complaint is made in the Committee's Report
in respect of the nine houses engaged by him. Not a shilling has, to
my knowledge or belief, been paid, or promised on account, of what I
may, for brevity, call "Mr. Flower's public houses"; so that, in
fact, these houses were {81} neither hired by, paid for, nor used by
the late members or their agents.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account