_Fifthly._ The increase of width will not increase the weight of an
engine (of the same power) 500 lbs., but I avail myself of the
larger width to get more powerful engines, and they weigh, with
water in the boiler, 18 to 21 tons. I send a drawing of one; the
stroke is 18 inches.
_Sixthly._ The passenger carriages are all on six wheels, and
excessively strong; at present the framework of carriages and the
whole of the waggons are made of iron. The first-class carriages
weigh, with wheels, &c., 7 tons 16 cwt. (17,472 lbs.), and carry 32
passengers. Second-class about the same weight, and hold 72.
_Seventhly_ and _Eighthly_. The comparison being on different
railways under different managements and totally different
circumstances, no strictly correct comparative results can be
given; and of course the most opposite opinions are entertained and
expressed. I believe we travel much quicker at the same cost and
with more ease, and certainly the wear and tear of engines and
carriages is _very much less_ with us than with the other lines;
but for the reasons above stated it cannot be made matter of exact
proof, but remains matter of opinion.
The report of the Gauge Commission, on being presented to Parliament,
was referred by the House of Commons to the Board of Trade, who reported
on it in June 1846. They did not, however, concur with the Commissioners
to the full extent of their recommendations; for, while admitting the
break of gauge to be an evil, they could not, having regard to the
circumstances under which the broad gauge companies had been
established, and the interest they had acquired, recommend either that
the broad gauge should be reduced to narrow, or that rails should be
laid down for narrow gauge traffic over all their lines. Such measures
would involve great expense, and they were unable to suggest any
equitable mode of meeting it.
This conclusion necessarily affected the opinion of the Board of Trade
in regard to the several lines under construction connected with the
Great Western Railway, which the Board recommended should be all made on
the broad gauge.
In regard to the broad-gauge lines sanctioned by Parliament from Oxford
to Rugby, and from Oxford to Worcester and Wolverhampton, the Board
determined to exercise their powers in requiring the narrow gauge to be
laid down, in addition to the broad.
The House of Commons adopted the recommendations of the Board of Trade,
and passed a series of resolutions in conformity thereto, and ‘An Act
for regulating the Gauge of Railways’ received the Royal Assent on
August 18, 1846.
It was enacted that it should not be lawful to construct any new
passenger railway on any other gauge than 4 feet 8½ inches in England,
and 5 feet 3 inches in Ireland.
Exceptions, however, were made in favour of certain lines in the west of
England and South Wales.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account