The Life of John Milton, Volume 5 (of 7), 1654-1660: Narrated in Connexion with the Political, Ecclesiastical, and Literary History of His TimeMasson, David
History
The Life of John Milton, Volume 5 (of 7), 1654-1660: Narrated in Connexion with the Political, Ecclesiastical, and Literary History of His Time
Masson, David
Milton, John, 1608-1674; Poets, English -- Early modern, 1500-1700 -- Biography
his Highness on this great mercy and deliverance." The interview was
on January the 23rd, in the Banqueting House in Whitehall, when
Speaker Widdrington made the address for the House, and Cromwell
replied in a most affectionate speech (_Speech_ VI.). The
thanksgiving was on Feb. 20; on which day Principal Gillespie of
Glasgow and Mr. Warren had the honour of preaching the special
sermons before the House in St. Margaret's, Westminster. The day was
wound up by a noble dinner in Whitehall, to which the whole House had
been invited by the Protector, followed by a concert, vocal and
instrumental, in the part of the Palace called the Cockpit.[1]
[Footnote 1: Commons Journals of dates given, and of Feb. 18;
Carlyle, III. 204-211; Godwin, IV. 331-333; _Merc. Pol._ No.
349 (Feb. 12-19, 1656-7); Whitlocke, IV. 286; Parl. Hist. III. 1490.]
Three days after the great dinner in Whitehall, i.e. on Monday, Feb.
23, 1656-7, there was an incident in the House which turned all the
future proceedings of this Second Parliament of the Protectorate into
a new channel. It is thus entered in the Journals:--
" ... Sir Christopher Pack [Ex-Mayor of London, knighted by
Cromwell, Sept. 25, 1655, and now one of the members for the City]
presented a Paper to the House, declaring it was somewhat come to
his hand tending to the Settlement of the Nation and of Liberty and
Property, and prayed it might be received and read; and, it being
much controverted whether the same should be read without farther
opening [preliminary explanation] thereof, the Question being
propounded _That this Paper, offered by Sir Christopher Pack, be
further opened by him before it is read,_ and the Question being
put _That this Question be now put,_ it passed in the Negative. The
Question being propounded _That this Paper, offered by Sir
Christopher Pack, be now read,_ and the Question being put _That
that Question be now put,_ the House was divided. The Noes went
forth:--Colonel Sydenham, Mr. Robinson, Tellers for the Noes--with
the Noes 54; Sir Charles Wolseley, Colonel Fitzjames, Tellers for
the Yeas--with the Yeas 144. So it passed in the Affirmative. And,
the main Question being put, it was Resolved _That this Paper,
offered by Sir Christopher Pack, be now read._ The said Paper was
read accordingly, and was entitled 'The Humble Address and
Remonstrance of the Knights, Citizens, and Burgesses, now assembled
in the Parliament of this Commonwealth.'"[1]
[Footnote 1: Commons Journals of date.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account