The life of John Worth KernBowers, Claude G. (Claude Gernade)
History
The life of John Worth Kern
Bowers, Claude G. (Claude Gernade)
Kern, John Worth, 1849-1917; Politicians -- United States -- Biography
During these days no man did more to hold the Indiana delegation
together for Marshall than Senator Kern. When on the 29th ballot Major
G. V. Menzies of Indiana broke the solidarity of the delegation by
voting for Kern no man resented it more than the senator, who was more
embarrassed than flattered. To all Indianians who called upon him at his
room with the suggestion that the “time has come to break from
Marshall”--and there were many both on and off the delegation--he
stubbornly refused to listen. The thought behind his uncompromising
attitude was that once the delegation broke away from its instructions
there was no certainty that the majority would not ultimately find their
way into the camp of ultra-conservativism.
Meanwhile he was given to understand that Illinois was ready at any
moment Indiana led the way to transfer her vote to him, and he had good
reasons for assuming that with his consent he could have the support of
Ohio. In the event such a “drive” had been undertaken, assurances were
given by men of potentiality that Michigan would follow and that far
western states such as Colorado and Wyoming would fall in line. It was a
tremendous temptation that was placed before him, and the very
incongruity of the company urging it--progressives and bosses--would
have made it seem to one less astute and less given to analysis as
peculiarly auspicious. The feeling between the followers of the two
leading candidates was hourly intensifying. The delegates were tired,
and many financially embarrassed by the unexpected prolongation of the
convention and were anxious to get away. If at such an hour and under
such circumstances three such states as Indiana, Illinois and Ohio had
bolted toward a dark horse, followed by Michigan and states from the far
west and from the south, it might have resulted in a stampede and his
nomination. It was Kern’s personal opinion that it might result in
throwing the convention into a turmoil of uncertainty out of which
would come the nomination of a reactionary; and such he believed to be
the intent of some who were most insistent on his giving consent. He
refused his consent.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account