The Life of Ludwig van Beethoven, Volume IIThayer, Alexander Wheelock
History
The Life of Ludwig van Beethoven, Volume II
Thayer, Alexander Wheelock
Beethoven, Ludwig van, 1770-1827
At the performances in November, the effect of the overture had been
ruined by a passage in the Allegro, which was too difficult for the
wood-wind instruments. “Instead of simply removing this obstacle (31
measures),” says Schindler, “Beethoven thought it advisable to rewrite
the whole, inasmuch as he was already engaged upon a revision of other
parts of the work. He retains the motivi of the Introduction as well
as the Allegro, has the motivo of the latter played by violoncellos
and violins simultaneously for the sake of greater sonority, and on
the existing foundation rears a new structure, including several new
thoughts.”[35]
[Sidenote: THE OVERTURES TO “FIDELIO”]
And thus for Beethoven the winter passed. To compete with successful
new works which Schikaneder offered the Vienna audiences of 1806,
was no light matter; and it is easy to imagine, that Beethoven felt
this, and determined, at all events in his own field of instrumental
composition, to leave no doubt who was master. Hence, that monumental
work, the great overture to “Leonore” in its second form. He was, as
usual, dilatory in meeting his engagements. January and February passed
and March drew to its close, and the overture was not ready. This was
too much for Baron Braun’s patience. He, therefore, selected the best
night of the season--Saturday, March 29, the last before the closing
of the theatre for Holy Week and Easter--and gave Beethoven distinctly
to understand, that if the opera was not performed on that evening, it
should not be given at all. This was effectual and the new score was
sent in; but so late, as Röckel well remembered, as to allow but two or
three rehearsals with pianoforte and one only with orchestra; and these
were directed by Seyfried--the composer appearing at neither.
Beethoven and Breuning supposed that a change of title from “Fidelio”
to “Leonore” had been agreed to by the directors, and indeed the new
text-book and Breuning’s poem on the occasion were so printed; but
it was determined otherwise. By the new arrangement of the scenes,
the number of acts was reduced to two. The new playbill therefore
substitutes “Opera in two Acts” for “three”; excepting this, the
change of date, and of Röckel’s for Demmer’s name as ~Florestan~, it
is a facsimile of the previous ones, and announces: “Fidelio oder die
Eheliche Liebe.” For this determination the directors may well have
urged, not only a proper regard for the composer of “Sargino” and the
(Italian) “Leonore,” but the manifest impropriety of misleading the
public by giving a new title to a work which remained essentially
unchanged. As on the original production, Breuning wrote a poem: “To
Herr Ludwig van Beethoven, on the occasion of the reproduction of the
opera composed by him and first performed on November 20, 1805, now
given under the new title ‘Leonore.’”
[Sidenote: UNSUCCESSFUL PERFORMANCES]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account