The Life of Ludwig van Beethoven, Volume IIIThayer, Alexander Wheelock
History
The Life of Ludwig van Beethoven, Volume III
Thayer, Alexander Wheelock
Beethoven, Ludwig van, 1770-1827
I am also sending you herewith the score of a mass by Reutter
which Beethoven wished to see. It is true that H. M. the Emperor
is fond of this style, but Beethoven, if he writes a mass, need
not adhere to it. Let him follow the bent of his great genius and
have a care only that the mass be not too long or too difficult
to perform;--that it be a _tutti_ mass and have only short
soprano and alto solos in the voices (for which I have two fine
singing-boys)--but no tenor, bass or organ solos. If he wishes he
may introduce a violin, oboe or clarinet solo.
His Majesty likes to have fugues well worked out but not too long;
the _Sanctus_ and _Osanna_ as short as possible, in order not to
delay the transubstantiation, and--if I may add something on my
own account--the _Dona nobis pacem_ connected with the _Agnus Dei_
without marked interruption, and soft. In two masses by Handel
(arranged from his anthems), two by Naumann and Abbé Stadler, this
makes a particularly beautiful effect. These in brief, as results
of my experience, are the things which are to be considered and
I should congratulate myself, the court and art if our great
Beethoven were soon to take the work in hand.
On March 10 Dietrichstein sent Beethoven three texts for graduals and
a like number for offertories from which to choose words to be used
in the mass to be composed for the emperor. On the count’s letter
Beethoven wrote the memorandum: “Treat the gradual as a symphony with
song--does it follow the _Gloria_?” Here we have some light on the
subject which came up for thought during the account of Beethoven’s
negotiations with publishers for the Mass in D. It would seem to
appear that Beethoven was much pleased with the interest manifested
in his application by Count Dietrichstein, and looked with auspicious
eye upon the latter’s plan to put him into the Emperor’s good books.
There can scarcely be a doubt but that he gave considerable thought
to the proposed mass even while still at work on the Mass in D. He
conceived the plan of accompanying the _Kyrie_ with wind-instruments
and organ only in a “new mass,” as he designates it, and sketches for
a _Dona nobis pacem_ which have been found “for the mass in C-sharp
minor” point to a treatment which may be said to be in harmony, so
far as can be seen, with Count Dietrichstein’s suggestions. On one
occasion he writes to Peters that he had not made up his mind which
mass he should have, and on another that he had three masses, two
other publishers having asked for such works. He tells Schindler that
reports that the Mass in D was not finished were to be denied because
they were not true, the unfinished numbers being additions. So also
he writes to the Archduke. These additions were to be a gradual, an
offertory, and a setting of the hymn _Tantum ergo sacramentum_, and it
is a fair presumption, since appropriate texts for the first two were
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account