Recurring to Illinois, we want something quite as much as, and
which is harder to get than, the electoral vote,--the
legislature,--and it is exactly on this point that Seward's
nomination would be hard on us. Suppose he should gain us a
thousand votes in Winnebago, it would not compensate for the
loss of fifty in Edgar.
A word now for your own special benefit. You better write no
letter which can be distorted into opposition, or
_quasi_-opposition, to me. There are men on the constant watch
for such things, out of which to prejudice my peculiar friends
against you. While I have no more suspicion of you than I have
of my best friend living, I am kept in a constant struggle
against questions of this sort. I have hesitated some to write
this paragraph, lest you should suspect I do it for my own
benefit and not for yours, but on reflection I conclude you
will not suspect me. Let no eye but your own see this--not that
there is anything wrong or even ungenerous in it, but it would
be misconstrued.
Your friend as ever,
A. LINCOLN.
What happened in the Chicago Convention was widely different from the
conjectures of these writers, but the result seemed entirely reasonable
after it was reached. Lincoln was as radical as Seward--subsequent
events proved him to be more so--but his tone and temper had been more
conservative, more sedative, more sympathetic toward "our Southern
brethren," as he often called them. He had never endorsed the
"higher-law doctrine," with which Seward's name was associated; he
believed that the South was entitled, under the Constitution, to an
efficient Fugitive Slave Law; he had never incurred the enmity, as
Seward had, of the Fillmore men, or of the American party.
These facts, coupled with some personal contact and neighborliness,
early attracted the conservative delegates of Indiana. Seward, with his
"irrepressible conflict" speech, had been too strong a dose for them,
but they were quite willing to take Lincoln, whose phrase, "the house
divided against itself," had preceded the irrepressible conflict speech
by some months. The example of Indiana bore immediate fruit in other
quarters, and especially in Pennsylvania. Curtin, the nominee for
governor, was early convinced that Seward could not carry that state,
but that Lincoln could. Curtin and Henry S. Lane, the nominee for
governor of Indiana, became active torch-bearers for Lincoln.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account